Abstract:Edward K. H. Stephens 1# , Jazmin Guayco Sigcha 1# , Kenneth Lopez-Loo 1 , Ian A. Yang 1,2 , Henry M. Marshall 1,2 , Kwun M. Fong 1,2 1 UQ Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 2 Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health District, Brisbane, Australia # These authors contributed equally to this work. Response to: Pura-Bryant J, Olivera JA, Antonoff MB. Biomarkers: a new frontier in lung cancer detection. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2024;13:210-2. Submitted Dec 22, 2023. Accepted for publication Jan 05, 2024. Published online Jan 25, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2023-5 We thank Pura-Bryant et al. for their recent commentary on our narrative review summarising biomarkers of lung cancer with applications in lung cancer screening (LCS) and in never-smokers (1,2). We appreciate in particular the point they raised on the impact that biomarkers of lung cancer will have on individuals who face disparities in LCS. Pura-Bryant et al. importantly highlight the work of Raman et al. , which discusses ethnic minorities experiencing a higher risk and higher rates of lung cancer in the US. Disparities in healthcare, including participation in clinical trials, can contribute significantly to the health inequities experienced by minority populations such as ethnic groups (3). When considering women who have never smoked, for instance, Asian women experience a disproportionately increased risk of lung cancer compared to other ethnicities. Biomarkers meant for universal application must be able to account or adjust for such variations. Thus, risk model-based screening that takes into consideration such factors can improve screening performance and additionally decrease ethnic disparities when compared to strategies solely dependent on age and smoking history (4). Complementing this advancement, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven personalised screening provides a targeted approach to lung cancer detection, which is especially advantageous for minority populations, including never-smokers. Through analyses of an individual's genetics, lifestyle, occupational history and medical background, AI can generate a comprehensive risk profile and recognise diverse genetic susceptibilities and environmental exposures prevalent among different groups (5). Furthermore, socioeconomic factors can also be considered to ensure that screening plans align not only with medical appropriateness, but also feasibility and accessibility for individuals from various backgrounds (6). Tailoring the risk model to the specific needs and preferences of minorities addresses potential disparities in health assessment and well-informed decision making. Nevertheless, it constitutes only a partial solution. Biomarkers that have the potential to replace traditional lung screening methods (i.e., agnostic to an individual's characteristics) on the other hand may overcome issues related to phenotypes, such as smoking status and ethnicity. Platforms such as multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests that screen patients for tumour determined biomarkers may have universal screening utility. For example, CancerSEEK employed a multianalyte blood-based MCED test that distinguished patients with eight common cancer types from healthy controls with high sensitivity (70%) and specificity (>99%) (7). MCED tests pose an attractive alternative to single-cancer screening tests, especially in low- and middle-income countries due to increased rates of cancer but decreased access to screening infrastructure. It is important that we continue acknowledge those facing disparities in LCS and care, and continue to work towards achieving equity in LCS and research. While valuable progress has been made in recent years, we must ensure ample representation of ethnically diverse populations in biomarker research to ensure those at a higher risk of developing lung cancer are recognised. Finally, accessibility to screening initiatives should remain at the forefront of our considerations to ensure socioeconomically disadvantaged people also have access to lung and other cancer screening where available. Funding: None. Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Lung Cancer Research . The article did not undergo external peer review. Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-2023-5/coif). K.M.F. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research from August 2023 to July 2025. K.M.F. has received competitive Research Grant Funding from MRFF and NHMRC in the past 36 months, -Abstract Truncated-

Prevention and treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: the Value-Based Healthcare approach to address social disparities

Healthcare disparities, screening, and molecular testing in the changing landscape of non–small cell lung cancer in the United States: a review

Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care

Quantifying the Value of Reduced Health Disparities: Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening of High-Risk Individuals Within the United States

Can early palliative care with anticancer treatment improve overall survival and patient-related outcomes in advanced lung cancer patients? A review of the literature

Biomarkers as a tool to reduce disparities in lung cancer screening and detection

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review

Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study

Equitable implementation of lung cancer screening: avoiding its potential to mirror existing inequities among people who use tobacco

Lung cancer research and treatment: global perspectives and strategic calls to action

Implementing Lung Cancer Screening and Prevention in Academic Centers, Affiliated Network Offices and Collaborating Care Sites

The Future of Lung Cancer Screening: Current Challenges and Research Priorities

Abstract A149: Lung cancer screening needs, barriers, and facilitators among patients and health care workers in rural areas with persistent poverty in the U.S. South

Cost‐of‐care discussions for individuals with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and melanoma: Findings from a large, population‐based pilot study

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in NSCLC molecular diagnostics uptake

Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial

Increasing access to biomarker-driven treatment for lung cancer in Alabama: The Alabama Access initiative.

Disparities in Lung Cancer: A Targeted Literature Review Examining Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes in the United States

Impact of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Care Quality and Surgical Outcomes for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in United States Veterans

The Cost Of Treating Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Estimates From The Chinese Experience

Computer-Tailored Decision Support Tool for Lung Cancer Screening: Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)