Abstract:Background: Violent attacks on and interferences with hospitals, ambulances, health workers, and patients during conflict destroy vital health services during a time when they are most needed and undermine the long-term capacity of the health system. In Syria, such attacks have been frequent and intense and represent grave violations of the Geneva Conventions, but the number reported has varied considerably. A systematic mechanism to document these attacks could assist in designing more protection strategies and play a critical role in influencing policy, promoting justice, and addressing the health needs of the population. Methods and findings: We developed a mobile data collection questionnaire to collect data on incidents of attacks on healthcare directly from the field. Data collectors from the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS), using the tool or a text messaging system, recorded information on incidents across four of Syria's northern governorates (Aleppo, Idleb, Hama, and Homs) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. SAMS recorded a total of 200 attacks on healthcare in 2016, 102 of them using the mobile data collection tool. Direct attacks on health facilities comprised the majority of attacks recorded (88.0%; n = 176). One hundred and twelve healthcare staff and 185 patients were killed in these incidents. Thirty-five percent of the facilities were attacked more than once over the data collection period; hospitals were significantly more likely to be attacked more than once compared to clinics and other types of healthcare facilities. Aerial bombs were used in the overwhelming majority of cases (91.5%). We also compared the SAMS data to a separate database developed by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) based on media reports and matched the incidents to compare the results from the two methods (this analysis was limited to incidents at health facilities). Among 90 relevant incidents verified by PHR and 177 by SAMS, there were 60 that could be matched to each other, highlighting the differences in results from the two methods. This study is limited by the complexities of data collection in a conflict setting, only partial use of the standardized reporting tool, and the fact that limited accessibility of some health facilities and workers and may be biased towards the reporting of attacks on larger or more visible health facilities. Conclusions: The use of field data collectors and use of consistent definitions can play an important role in the tracking incidents of attacks on health services. A mobile systematic data collection tool can complement other methods for tracking incidents of attacks on healthcare and ensure the collection of detailed information about each attack that may assist in better advocacy, programs, and accountability but can be practically challenging. Comparing attacks between SAMS and PHR suggests that there may have been significantly more attacks than previously captured by any one methodology. This scale of attacks suggests that targeting of healthcare in Syria is systematic and highlights the failure of condemnation by the international community and medical groups working in Syria of such attacks to stop them.

Violence against health staff in conflict zones reached record high in 2023

Violence against Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Incidents from a Lower-Middle-Income Country

Media Contribution to Violence Against Health Workers in China: a Content Analysis Study of 124 Online Media Reports

Workplace Violence and Its Aftermath in China's Health Sector: Implications from a Cross-Sectional Survey Across Three Tiers of the Health System

The magnitude and determinants of violence against healthcare workers in Pakistan

A mini-review on safeguarding global health amidst a "Pandemic" of armed conflicts

Workplace Violence and Its Aftermath among Health Workers in Zhejiang Province: a Cross-Sectional Study

Violence against healthcare workers during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Egypt: a cross-sectional study

Violence against healthcare workers during the phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a descriptive observational study from 2018 to 2023 in the metropolitan city of Genoa (North-Western Italy)

ViSHWaS: Violence Study of Healthcare Workers and Systems-a global survey

"There is a fear that you will be attacked just for the act of working in health": a survey of experiences of violence against healthcare in Colombia

The Prevalence of Violence Against Healthcare Workers in Trinidad and Tobago

Healthcare Workers: Heroes or Victims? Context of the Western World and Proposals to Prevent Violence

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on conflict and health system-related violent events in Libya: An interrupted time series analysis

Determining the scope of attacks on health in four governorates of Syria in 2016: Results of a field surveillance program

Understanding workplace violence against medical staff in China: a retrospective review of publicly available reports

Violence study of healthcare workers and systems in the Caribbean: ViSHWaS-Caribbean study

Workplace violence against healthcare workers in the emergency department in Hong Kong

Protecting health facilities during wars in the COVID-19 era: A case study of the Indonesian Hospital in the Gaza Strip in the Palestinian Territories

Workplace Violence among Healthcare Providers during the COVID-19 Health Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Study

Tracking Workplace Violence Over 20 Years