Abstract:Rationale & objective: Percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are created by establishing a proximal forearm anastomosis and offer a safe and reliable vascular access. This study compares the Ellipsys percutaneous AVF with a proximal forearm Gracz-type surgical AVF, chosen for comparison as it is constructed at the same anatomical site. Study design: Retrospective study of prospectively collected clinical data. Setting & participants: All vascular access procedures conducted during a 34-month period were reviewed. The study groups comprised 89 percutaneous AVFs and 69 surgical AVFs. Exposure: Percutaneous or surgical AVF placement. Outcome: AVF patency, function, and complications. Analytical approach: Patency rates for each AVF group were evaluated by competing risk survival analysis using a cumulative incidence function. Association of primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency with the AVF groups was examined by Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Technical success was 100% for both groups. Average procedure times were 14 minutes for percutaneous AVFs and 74 minutes for surgical AVFs (P < 0.001). Proximal radial artery (PRA) was used in all percutaneous AVF cases. Inflow for surgical AVFs included radial (30%), ulnar (12%), and brachial (58%) arteries. Outflow veins for both groups were the cephalic and/or basilic veins. Access flow volumes, times to maturation, and overall numbers of interventions per patient-year were not significantly different. Cumulative incidence of primary patency failure at 12 months was lower for surgical AVF (47% vs 64%, P = 0.1), but secondary patency failure was not different between groups (20% vs 12%, P = 0.3). PRA surgical AVFs had similar primary patency (65% vs 64%, P = 0.8) but higher secondary patency failure rates than percutaneous AVFs at 12 months (34% vs 12%, P = 0.04). Limitations: Retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up period, and not all patients required hemodialysis at the end of study. Conclusions: Both percutaneous and surgical AVFs demonstrated high rates of technical success and secondary patency. Percutaneous AVFs required shorter procedure times. The rate of intervention was similar. When a distal radial artery AVF is not feasible, percutaneous AVF might offer an appropriate procedure for creating a safe and functional access, maintaining further proximal forearm surgical AVF creation options.

A Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Distal Radial Access vs. Conventional Transradial or Transvenous Access for Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Totally Percutaneous Decannulation in Patients with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

The Outcome of the Proximal Radial Artery Arteriovenous Fistula.

Procedural Feasibility and Peri-procedural Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Therapy via Transradial versus Transfemoral Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Distal AVF creation with marginal calcified radial artery: Multicentric experience of intraoperative intravascular lithotripsy

Traditional Versus Distal Radial Access for Coronary Diagnostic and Revascularization Procedures: Final Results of the TENDERA Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Contemporary outcomes of distal radial artery ligation for access related hand ischemia

Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry

Is endovascular arteriovenous fistula a feasible alternative for hemodialysis patients?

Snuffbox distal transradial access (dTRA) for arteriovenous fistuloplasty in Singapore: Going distal is safe

X-ray-guided and ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat arteriovenous fistula dysfunction in hemodialysis patients: A retrospective controlled study

Feasibility of routine ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of native arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

Rotational thrombectomy versus balloon maceration in dialysis access salvage

Comparison of Ellipsys Percutaneous and Proximal Forearm Gracz-Type Surgical Arteriovenous Fistulas

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Distal Trans‐Radial Access in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Distal radial access in the anatomical snuffbox for neurointerventions: a feasibility, safety, and proof-of-concept study

Ultrasound guided interventional procedures on arteriovenous fistulae

Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography

Comparative study between 1-year patency of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula versus brachial to basilic forearm loop graft in patients with end-stage renal disease

Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study