Abstract:Objective. The previous meta-analysis has assessed that distal transradial access (dTRA) in anatomical snuffbox is safe and effective for coronary angiography and intervention and can reduce radial artery occlusion. However, since the publication of the previous meta-analysis, several observational studies have been added, so we performed an updated meta-analysis to include more eligible studies to compare distal transradial access in anatomical snuffbox with conventional transradial access (cTRA). Method. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies from the literature published until 5 January 2021 to evaluate catheterization/puncture failure, hematoma, radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion (RAO), access time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose area product, total procedure time, and hemostatic device removal time. The pooled odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Results. A total of 9,054 patients from 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis, and we found no significant difference in catheterization/puncture failure (OR = 1.94, 95CI [0.97, 3.86], P = 0.06 ), hematoma (OR = 0.97, 95CI [0.55, 1.73], P = 0.926 ), radial artery spasm (OR = 0.76, 95CI [0.43, 1.36], P = 0.354 ), total procedure time (SMD = 0.23, 95CI [−0.21, 0.68], P = 0.308 ), or radiation dose area product (WMD = 216.88 Gy/cm2, 95CI [−126.24, 560.00], P = 0.215 ), but dTRA had a lower incidence of RAO (OR = 0.39, 95CI [0.23, 0.66], P < 0.001 ), shorter hemostatic device removal time (WMD = −66.62 min, 95CI [−76.68, −56.56], P < 0.001 ), longer access time (SMD = 0.32, 95CI [0.08, 0.56], P = 0.008 ), and longer fluoroscopy time (SMD = 0.16, 95CI [−0.00, 0.33], P = 0.05 ) than cTRA. Conclusion. Compared with the cTRA, the dTRA has a lower incidence of radial artery occlusion and shorter hemostatic device removal time, which is worthy of further evaluation in clinical practice.

Traditional Versus Distal Radial Access for Coronary Diagnostic and Revascularization Procedures: Final Results of the TENDERA Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transradial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

Distal Versus Proximal Radial Arterial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Distal versus traditional radial access in patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early prevention of radial artery occlusion via distal transradial access for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Distal Radial Artery Access is a Safe and Feasible Technique in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Visceral Intervention

Distal Radial Access for Coronary Procedures in a Large Prospective Multicenter Registry

Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial

Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial

Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Trial sequential analysis

Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography

Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox

Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Feasibility and radial artery occlusion rate of sheathless distal transradial access using balloon guide catheters

Assessment of acute radial artery injury after distal transradial access for coronary intervention: an optical coherence tomography study

Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion following trans-radial coronary intervention using 6-french versus 7-french sheaths

Sheathless versus standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Transradial Versus Transfemoral Method of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Procedural and Late-Term Outcomes.

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Distal Trans‐Radial Access in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience

A Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Distal Radial Access vs. Conventional Transradial or Transvenous Access for Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas