Factors related to clearance of the small pelvic cavity during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
Hikaru Hiraishi,Yoshikazu Kitahara,Mio Kobayashi,Yuko Hasegawa,Yumiko Tsukui,Miki Miida,Kohshiro Nakao,Sadatomo Ikeda,Takashi Hirakawa,Akira Iwase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15978
2024-05-29
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Abstract:Aim To identify factors influencing the Trendelenburg angle required during laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery at a single university hospital between May 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021 were enrolled. Data were extracted from the medical records, while magnetic resonance imaging scans and all laparoscopic surgery videos were retrospectively reviewed to assess the presence of the small intestine in the pelvic cavity as well as the adhesions at each site. Groups with and without the small intestine in the pelvic cavity, and those requiring a Trendelenburg angle above or below 13° were compared. Results In total, 219 patients were examined. The Trendelenburg angle was significantly higher (p = 0.004), while a significant increase in ovarian adhesions was observed (p = 0.033; odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–5.01) in the group without the presence of the small intestine in the pelvic cavity. Furthermore, the group requiring a Trendelenburg angle of ≥13° had significantly thicker subcutaneous fat (p = 0.044) and more ileal adhesions (p = 0.040, OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03–3.23) than the group with an angle of <13°. Conclusion Cases of ileal adhesions or thick subcutaneous fat are more likely to require a Trendelenburg angle of ≥13°. Therefore, Trendelenburg complications should be considered in this group. In addition, ovarian adhesions make it more difficult to exclude the small intestine from the small pelvic cavity, and may be associated with endometriosis.
obstetrics & gynecology