Abstract:Background: The risk of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related complications in patients hospitalized with solid tumors remains unclear. Existing studies are limited by single-center, outpatient designs and include heterogenous patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed and included adult patients with solid organ cancers who were admitted to a general medicine ward or intensive care unit and received a PICC. Data were collected from November 2013 to December 2019 at 50 Michigan hospitals. Major complications were defined as central line-associated bloodstream infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and catheter occlusion. Hospital variation in PICC use and outcomes was examined. Results: Data included 3235 hospitalized patients with solid tumors who had PICCs placed for 51,047 catheter days. Most catheters were double-lumen devices (57.0%). Notably, 17.5% of patients had another central venous catheter at the time of PICC insertion. The most common indications for PICC use were antibiotics (34.5%) and difficult access or blood draws (21.6%); chemotherapy was the primary indication in only 15.7% of patients. A major PICC-related complication occurred in 491 patients (15.2%); catheter occlusion was the most prevalent complication (n = 322; 10.0%) followed by deep vein thrombosis (n = 116; 3.6%), central line-associated bloodstream infection (n = 82; 2.5%), and pulmonary embolism (n = 20; 0.6%). Significant variation in indications for PICC use, device characteristics, and frequency of major complications across hospitals was observed (p < .001). Conclusions: PICCs were associated with significant complications in hospitalized patients who had solid malignancies and were often used for reasons other than chemotherapy. Policies and guidance for the appropriate use of PICCs in oncologic patients appear necessary. Lay summary: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are devices placed in peripheral veins to deliver medication to large veins near the heart. PICCs are used frequently in oncology. The objective of this report was to describe PICC-associated complications in hospitalized patients with solid tumors. This study was performed across 50 Michigan hospitals and included 3235 patients with solid tumor cancers and who had a PICC. Overall, 15.2% of patients experienced a complication, including central line-associated bloodstream infections, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or catheter occlusion. Complication rates varied across hospitals. PICCs are associated with substantial complications in hospitalized patients with solid tumors.

PERFORATION OF THE GALL BLADDER BY A PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER GUIDEWIRE: ‘IF IT CAN HAPPEN IT WILL’

P146 PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER AND PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA: WHAT SHOULD WE KNOW?

Embolization of a Fractured Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter to Pulmonary Arteries: A Sporadic Life-Threatening Phenomenon

Tricuspid valve vegetation related to leaflet injury: a unique problem of catheter malposition

Percutaneous removal of a precariously placed pericardial peripherally inserted central catheter

Migrated Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in the Right Ventricle and Bilateral Pulmonary Arteries: A Case Report

Analysis of factors related to thrombosis in patients with PICC placements

Comparing the accuracy and complications of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement using fluoroscopic and the blind pushing technique

Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients

Left Ventricular Perforation Following Transcutaneous Pigtail Catheter Placement Mimicking Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction: An Unusual Complication

Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study

The ultimate proof of paradoxical embolism and a percutaneous solution

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE USE OF A CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER AND A CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PERIPHERAL INSERTION: ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH PROCEDURE

A Nurse-Inserted Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Program in General Pediatrics: a Single-Center Experience

Bladder perforation due to laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheterization: A case report and literature review

Clinical outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with gastroenterological diseases: Report of a 9-year experience

Uncommon Malposition of an Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter in the Renal Vein through the Superficial Femoral Vein: A Case Report

Clinical study of complications of a peripherally inserted central catheter in cancer patients

Peripherally inserted central catheter related pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade in neonates: Analysis of two cases and literature review

Perforation of the Heart During Elective Removal of an Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Picc Line Associated Brachiocephalic Vein Rupture with Consequent Mediastinal Placement Causing Pneumomediastinum and Large Total Parenteral Nutrition Bilateral Effusion