Nitrogen addition affects leiaf nutrition and photosynthesis in a nutrient-poor northern Vermont forest

D. Ellsworth
Abstract:Sugar maple-dominated forest ecosystems in the northeastern U.S. have been receiving precipitation nitrogen (N) inputs of 15-20 kg N ha-’ year’ since at least the mid 1980’s. Sustained chronic N inputs of this magnitude into nutrient-poor forest ecosystems may cause eutrophication and affect ecosystem functioning as well as the nutritional balance of mineral elements in the tree crown. Canopy responses to N addition at a low rate (30 kg N hayear ‘) over two years were studied in a sugar maple stand on a highly organic, acid soil in northern Vermont to understand the potential effects of N loading on crown nutritioil and photosynthesis. In each year, NO,-N was added jLrst prior to budbreak at a rate of 30 kg ha 1 which was approximately 2r the atmospheric wet deposition rate measured at inearby sites. In late July and early August, fully-expandecl canopy leaves were collected for measurements of foliar nutrition and leaf photosynthetic measurements under optional field conditions. Foliar N increased by an average of approximately 4 mg g.’ or 28% each year in response to N addition, and maximum leaf photosynthetic rate rose 35% with N fertilization. Changes in leaf N concentration and content were consistent with the interpretation that N was limiting leaf biomass production in the stand. Although stand growth and photosynthetic function appear to be strongly limited by N, there is evidence of other lirnitations to photosynthesis and/or nutritional imbalances in the stand. However, there was no evidence that N addition at the rate used exacerbated other nutrient limitations in the first two years following fertilization. Thus, the sugar maple forest appears to have the potential to continue to store carbon as photosynthate as a result of continuing N deposition to the region. 1997, Vitousek et al. 1997). It has been suggested that elevated atmospheric N inputs intc forest ecosystems may lead to growth dilution of other nutrients, causing nutrient deficiency (Nihlgard 1985, Agren and Bosatta 1988) although this hypothesis has rarely been tested (but see Lea et al. 1980).
Environmental Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?