Abstract:Study Objective To evaluate the clinical benefits of laparoscopic pectopexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting A tertiary hospital. Patients We included 203 patients with POP. Interventions Laparoscopic pectopexy or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Measurements and main results Anatomical effectiveness was measured using the POP-quantification (POP-Q) system, both pre- and post-operation. Functional recovery effectiveness was evaluated using complications and recurrence rates within one year. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaires at enrollment and postoperative months 3, 6, and 12. Comparisons between groups were performed using t- test, Chi-square test, and mixed-effects model with repeated measures. The analysis included 203 eligible patients (sacrocolpopexy 101; pectopexy 102). The proportion of robotic-assisted surgeries was lower in the pectopexy group than in the sacrocolpopexy group (15.7% vs. 41.6%, p <0.001). The average operation time of pectopexy was shorter than that of sacrocolpopexy (174.2 vs. 187.7 mins) with a mean difference of 13.5 min (95%CI, 3.9-23.0; p =0.006). Differences of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and postoperative 7-day complications between groups were not significant. Anatomical successes were obtained in both groups with similar improvement in POP-Q scores. The rate of urinary symptoms recurrence was higher in the pectopexy group (13.7%) than in the sacrocolpexy group (5.0%) at the one-year follow-up (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.8, p =0.032). The PFDI-20 and I-QOL scores were better improved at postoperative months 3, 6 and 12 for laparoscopic pectopexy than for sacrocolpopexy. Conclusion Laparoscopic pectopexy revealed comparable anatomical success, shorter operation time, and better improvement in QOL scores of prolapse, colorectal-anal and urinary symptoms at 1-year follow-up, possibly being an alternative when sacrocolpopexy is not practicable. However, clinicians should pay more attention to the recurrence of urinary symptoms after pectopexy.

Value of pelvic examination in women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review

Diagnostic value of pelvic floor ultrasonography for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review

Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function

Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement

Nonoperative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery

170: DEVELOPMENT OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE GUIDELINES

Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following colpocleisis: A meta-analysis

Influence of Transperineal Ultrasound on the POP-Q System in the Surgical Indication of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women’s treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse

Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?

Pessary or surgery for a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: the PEOPLE study, a multicentre prospective cohort study

Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue

Effectiveness of laparoscopic pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Pelvic organ prolapse: review of the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management

Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review Using the COnsensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist

[Factors Influencing Therapy Decision in Patients with Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Strenuous physical activity, exercise, and pelvic organ prolapse: a narrative scoping review

[Relevance between expectations before treatment, new symptoms and satisfaction after treatment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse].

Pregnancy, labour and delivery as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review