Abstract:Objective To investigate clinical significance and application of modified pelvic floor reconstruction developed by Peking Union Medical College Hospital ( MPFR ) in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by comparing the effectiveness, quality of postoperative sexual life, life satisfaction and risk factors for POP recurrence with the following two surgical procedures: traditional total vaginal hysterectomy with anterior-posterior colporrhaphy (TVH-APC) and total vaginal hysterectomy with lateral colporrhaphy and sacrospinous ligament fixation and vaginal bridge repair and episiotomy (TVH-LC-SSLFVBR-EP). Methods Totally 173 patients with severe POP and at least two compartments defects of pelvic floor underwent surgeries in the study, 86 patients (group A) were treated by MPFR with polypropylene mesh application, 58 (group B) were treated by TVH-APC, and 29 patients (group C) were treated by TVH-LC-SSLF-VBR-EP. Peri-operative data and outcomes of postoperative courses at 6, 12, 18 months were collected and analyzed, in the meantime, the risk factors of recurrence were studied. Results (1) No statistical difference was observed among the above 3 groups in terms of length of operation, amount of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and morbidity after surgery ( P ＞ 0.05). ( 2 ) Cost hospitalization was ( 11 448 ±3049) Yuan in group A, which was significantly higher than (7262 ± 1607) Yuan in group B and (7140 ± 1817 ) Yuan in group C (P ＜ 0.05 ). (3) The length of vaginal cuff of (7.5 ± 1.4) cm in group A and ( 5.6 ± 1.1 ) cm in group C were significantly longer than (7.1±0.6) cm in group B ( P＜0.05). The width of vaginal cuff of (4.3±0.3) cm in group A was larger than (3.4±0.3) cm in group B and (3.3±0.4) cm in group C (P＜0.05). (4) The recurrence rate at 12 months after surgery was 12.8% (11/86)in group A, which was similar with 17.2%(5/29) in group C (P＞0.05) and significantly less than 36.2% (21/58) in group B (P＜0.05). The rate of active sexual life of 16.3% (14/86) in group A was significantly higher than 1.7% (1/58) in group B and 0 in group C ( P ＜ 0. 05 ). The index of life quality improvement at 12 months after surgery was 48±12 in group A, which was no less than 53±16 in group C ( P＞0.05) and higher than 27 ± 9 in group B ( P＜0.05). (5 ) Mesh rejection was observed in 6 patients in group A within 3 months after surgery, while the posterior vaginal wall was exclusively involved. No difference was found in urinary retention or urinary incontinence among three groups (P ＞0. 05 ). (6) The severe degree of POP, type of surgical procedure ( TVT-APC), anterior compartment defect of pelvic floor,and early days of performing pelvic floor reconstruction surgeries were high risk factors for POP recurrence (P＜ 0.05). Conclusions MPFR has a better curative effect and lower recurrence rate on patients with POP. It can help patients regain integrity of anatomical structure and functions of pelvic floor. TVH-LCSSLF-VBR-EP is also effective.

Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following colpocleisis: A meta-analysis

LeFort Colpocleisis for Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes, Recurrence, Satisfaction, and Regret after Total Colpocleisis with Concomitant Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Clinical Analysis of the Relapse and Its Related Factors in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue

Advanced Cystocele is a Risk Factor for Surgical Failure after Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Changes in Bowel Symptoms after Different Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgeries among Elderly Women at the 1-Year Follow Up.

Medium-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pubocervical Fascia Reconstruction and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Posterior Approach for a Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Study of 124 Cases

Long term follow-up after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy

Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence

The effect of advanced age on peri- and post-operative complications following pelvic floor repair surgeries

Risk of pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy for benign conditions: A nationwide cohort study

[Comparison of Perioperative Conditions Between Total and Partial Colpocleisis for Elderly Patients Suffered from Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Long-term treatment outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery versus anterior-posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach

Incidence and Risk Factors for Genitourinary Tract Injury Within 1 Year After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy—A Surgical Challenge

Risk factors predicting the loss of functional independence after obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse