Abstract:Background Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from medical/surgical floors and increased boarding times of ICU patients in the emergency department (ED) are common; approximately half of these are associated with adverse events. We explore the potential role of a tele-critical care consult service (TC3) in managing critically ill patients outside of the ICU and potentially preventing low-acuity unplanned admissions and also investigate its design and implementation needs. Methods We conducted a qualitative study involving general observations of the units, shadowing of clinicians during patient transfers, and interviews with clinicians from the ED, medical/surgical floor units and their ICU counterparts, tele-ICU, and the rapid response team at a large academic medical center in St. Louis, Missouri, United States. We used a hybrid thematic analysis approach supported by open and structured coding using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results Over 165 hours of observations/shadowing and 26 clinician interviews were conducted. Our findings suggest that a tele-critical care consult (TC3) service can prevent avoidable, lower acuity ICU admissions by offering a second set of eyes via remote monitoring and providing guidance to bedside and rapid response teams in the care delivery of these patients on the floor/ED. CFIR-informed enablers impacting the successful implementation of the TC3 service included the optional and on-demand features of the TC3 service, around-the-clock availability, and continuous access to trained critical care clinicians for avoidable lower acuity (ALA) patients outside of the ICU, familiarity with tele-ICU staff, and a willingness to try alternative patient risk mitigation strategies for ALA patients (suggested by TC3), before transferring all unplanned admissions to ICUs. Conversely, the CFIR-informed barriers to implementation included a desire to uphold physician autonomy by floor/ED clinicians, potential role conflicts with rapid response teams, additional workload for floor/ED nurses, concerns about obstructing unavoidable, higher acuity admissions, and discomfort with audio-visual tools. To amplify these potential enablers and mitigate potential barriers to TC3 implementation, informed by this study, we propose two key characteristics— essential for extending the delivery of critical care services beyond the ICU — underlying a telemedicine critical care consultation model including its virtual footprint and on-demand and optional service features. Conclusion Tele-critical care represents an innovative strategy for delivering safe and high-quality critical care services to lower acuity borderline patients outside the ICU setting. The Washington University Human Research Protections Office (IRB# 202205091) approved this study, and verbal consent was obtained from all participants. J.A., B.F., and C.P. led the conception and design of the study. M.K. and J.A. were involved in the data collection; J.A. and M.K. conducted independent data coding and analysis and drafted the manuscript. J.A., M.K., B.F., and C.P. participated in peer-debriefing sessions to discuss the results and their interpretations. All authors were involved in critically reviewing its content and editing the manuscript. All authors have provided their final approval of the version to be submitted. The study was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis, Institutional Review Board (IRB # 202109011), and consents were obtained from all participants. Participants who completed interviews received compensation of $15 on a reloadable debit card. All authors have approved the publication of this manuscript. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Received: 21 July 2023 Accepted: 15 January 2024 Article published online: 06 March 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Critical Illness Outside the Intensive Care Unit: Research Challenges in Emergency and Prehospital Settings

Guidance to inform research recruitment processes for studies involving critically ill patients

Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission

Redefining critical illness

Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU: 2023

Informed consent in the intensive care unit: ensuring understanding in a complex environment

The prevalence and outcomes of critical illness: A prospective multi-centre study in Malawi and Sweden

Resuscitation room management of critically ill nontraumatic patients in a German emergency department (OBSERvE-study)

Evolving Understanding of Patients' Experiences in Acute Care Trials Without Prospective Consent*

Can the critically ill consent to participation in commercial television programmes? An Australian prehospital and emergency medicine perspective

Expanding Critical Care Delivery beyond the Intensive Care Unit: Determining the Design and Implementation Needs for a Tele-Critical Care Consultation Service

A Survey to Assess Primary Care Physician Awareness of Complications Following Critical Illness

Health concerns of intensive care survivors and research participation willingness: A multicentre survey

Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020

Practical considerations of implementing disaster crisis standards of care in the intensive care unit: A scoping review

Health-related quality-of-life and health-utility reporting in critical care

Ethics of non-therapeutic research on imminently dying patients in the intensive care unit

Impact of a Critical Care Specialist Intervention on First Pass Success for Emergency Airway Management Outside the ICU

Executive Summary: Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU

A Qualitative Analysis of Barriers to Evidence-Based Care in the Prehospital Management of Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Interhospital Variation in Admissions Managed With Critical Care Therapies or Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: An Analysis From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry