Abstract:Background Delivering intensive care therapies concordant with patients' values and preferences is considered gold standard care. To achieve this, healthcare professionals must better understand decision-making processes and factors influencing them. Aim The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing decision-making processes about implementing and limiting intensive care therapies. Design Systematic integrative review, synthesising quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Methods Five databases were searched (Medline, The Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL plus) for peer-reviewed, primary research published in English from 2010 to Oct 2022. Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies focussing on intensive care decision-making were included for appraisal. Full-text review and quality screening included the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool for qualitative and mixed methods and the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument for quantitative studies. Papers were reviewed by two authors independently, and a third author resolved disagreements. The primary author developed a thematic coding framework and performed coding and pattern identification using NVivo, with regular group discussions. Results Of the 83 studies, 44 were qualitative, 32 quantitative, and seven mixed-methods studies. Seven key themes were identified: what the decision is about; who is making the decision; characteristics of the decision-maker; factors influencing medical prognostication; clinician-patient/surrogate communication; factors affecting decisional concordance; and how interactions affect decisional concordance. Substantial thematic overlaps existed. The most reported decision was whether to withhold therapies, and the most common decision-maker was the clinician. Whether a treatment recommendation was concordant was influenced by multiple factors including institutional cultures and clinician continuity. Conclusion Decision-making relating to intensive care unit therapy goals is complicated. The current review identifies that breadth of decision-makers, and the complexity of intersecting factors has not previously been incorporated into interventions or considered within a single review. Its findings provide a basis for future research and training to improve decisional concordance between clinicians and patients/surrogates with regards to intensive care unit therapies.

[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine]

Decision-making among the Substitute Decision Makers in Intensive Care Units: an Investigation of Decision Control Preferences and Decisional Conflicts

[Priority setting in intensive care from an ethical perspective]

Ethisch begründet entscheiden in der Intensivmedizin

Factors influencing decision-making processes for intensive care therapy goals: A systematic integrative review

The politics of end-of-life decision-making: computerised decision-support tools, physicians' jurisdiction and morality

Complex decision making in an intensive care environment: Perceived practice versus observed reality

Ethics of ICU triage during COVID-19

Intensivists' ethical perceptions about decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment: A clinical ethics empirical investigation

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model

Analysis on Ethical Issues in Intensive Care Unit

[Intensive care and priority setting during catastrophe or war]

Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM

Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists

Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool

[Ethical aspects in the context of extracorporeal life support systems (ECLS): consensus paper of the DGK, DGTHG and DGAI]

[Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM. German version]

Complex Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Discussion Paper and Suggested Model

Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Geriatrics: An Ethical Analysis

Critical care nurses' experiences of ethical challenges in end-of-life care

At the end: A vignette-based investigation of strategies for managing end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit