Comparative epidemiology of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (HOBSIs) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) across a three-hospital health system

Jay Krishnan,Erin B Gettler,Melissa Campbell,Ibukunoluwa C Kalu,Jessica Seidelman,Becky Smith,Sarah Lewis,Erin B. Gettler,Ibukunoluwa C. Kalu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.38
2024-03-22
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the comparative epidemiology of hospital-onset bloodstream infection (HOBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) Design and Setting: Retrospective observational study of HOBSI and CLABSI across a three-hospital healthcare system from 01/01/2017 to 12/31/2021 Methods: HOBSIs were identified as any non-commensal positive blood culture event on or after hospital day 3. CLABSIs were identified based on National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) criteria. We performed a time-series analysis to assess comparative temporal trends among HOBSI and CLABSI incidence. Using univariable and multivariable regression analyses, we compared demographics, risk factors, and outcomes between non-CLABSI HOBSI and CLABSI, as HOBSI and CLABSI are not exclusive entities. Results: HOBSI incidence increased over the study period (IRR 1.006 HOBSI/1,000 patient days; 95% CI 1.001–1.012; P = .03), while no change in CLABSI incidence was observed (IRR .997 CLABSIs/1,000 central line days, 95% CI .992–1.002, P = .22). Differing demographic, microbiologic, and risk factor profiles were observed between CLABSIs and non-CLABSI HOBSIs. Multivariable analysis found lower odds of mortality among patients with CLABSIs when adjusted for covariates that approximate severity of illness (OR .27; 95% CI .11–.64; P < .01). Conclusions: HOBSI incidence increased over the study period without a concurrent increase in CLABSI in our study population. Furthermore, risk factor and outcome profiles varied between CLABSI and non-CLABSI HOBSI, which suggest that these metrics differ in important ways worth considering if HOBSI is adopted as a quality metric.
infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the comparative epidemiological characteristics of hospital - onset bloodstream infections (HOBSI) and central line - associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in a healthcare system consisting of three hospitals. Specifically, the researchers focused on the following aspects: 1. **Time - trend analysis**: The researchers evaluated the time - varying trends in the incidence of HOBSI and CLABSI through time - series analysis. 2. **Patient - level comparative analysis**: The researchers compared non - CLABSI HOBSI with CLABSI in terms of patient demographic characteristics, microbiological differences, and risk factors. 3. **Outcome comparison**: The researchers also compared the differences in patient prognoses between CLABSI and non - CLABSI HOBSI, including the number of days of hospitalization after infection, the duration of antibiotic use, and in - hospital mortality. The main purpose of the study was to explore whether HOBSI could be used as an evaluation indicator for future medical quality, especially on the basis of or in place of CLABSI. The researchers hypothesized that there might be important differences between HOBSI and CLABSI, and these differences are worthy of in - depth study in order to better guide the implementation of infection prevention measures.