Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Misclassifications—Rethinking the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Definition and Its Implications

Madhuri M Sopirala,Carolee D Estelle,La'Titia Houston,Madhuri M. Sopirala,Carolee D. Estelle,La’Titia Houston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006175

IF: 8.8

2024-02-22

Critical Care Medicine

Abstract:Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) have been a major focus in the United States over the past few decades. It has been a fascinating journey for CLABSI from when they were considered collateral damage to patient care with a "To err is human" attitude to this day when they are considered largely preventable ( 1 , 2 ). CLABSI occurrence was 80% lower in ICUs in the year 2013 than it was during the years 1992–1999 per data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ( 2 ). The cultural change that contributed to this decrease on a global scale was no easy feat to achieve. It was essentially driven by the CDC, which created a valid and reliable measure, collecting and sharing data through its National Health Safety Network (NHSN) ( 3 ). Other key changemakers were federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which funded implementation science research, and pioneers who spearheaded this research, informing national guidelines ( 2 , 4–6 ). Policymakers who integrated the national healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) action plan into value-based purchasing likely contributed to increased dialogue around HAIs. Financial penalty is imparted on hospitals via the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, which reduces overall Medicare payments by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) based on hospitals' performance on HAC measures including CLABSI ( 7 ). While all the above were drivers of change, the real burden of reducing CLABSI occurrence rested on clinicians and frontline staff who really took local ownership of this task ( 8 ). This was likely a result primarily of intrinsic motivation rather than extrinsic penalties ( 9 ). But first, a case was to be made that these were preventable and that there was a reliable way to measure these infections. In our experience, the stakeholder and frontline healthcare provider trust in the CLABSI prevention process was hard-earned by infection preventionists (IPs)/hospital epidemiologists and played a major role in reducing CLABSI occurrence.

critical care medicine