Pulmonary Rehabilitation Associated with Noninvasive Ventilation on Physical Capacity and Quality of Life in Post-COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Clinical Trial Protocol
Guilherme Arêas,Cássia Goulart,Thaís Sant'Anna,Tiótrefis Fernandes,Rafael Alvim,Fernanda Borges,Camila Miriam Amaral,Suzy Cristina Rodrigues,Jefferson Valente,João Marcos Ferreira,Anna Rezende,Edival Oliveira Júnior,Marcus Vinícius Lacerda,Fernando Almeida-Val
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s438120
2024-04-06
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, 1, 2 Cássia da Luz Goulart, 3 Thaís Sant'Anna, 4 Tiótrefis Gomes Fernandes, 4 Rafael de Oliveira Alvim, 1 Fernanda Facioli dos Reis Borges, 1 Camila Miriam Suemi Sato Barros do Amaral, 3 Suzy Cristina França Rodrigues, 1 Jefferson Valente, 3 João Marcos Bemfica Barbosa Ferreira, 5 Anna Gabriela Rezende, 1, 3 Edival Ferreira de Oliveira Júnior, 6 Marcus Vinícius Guimarães de Lacerda, 3, 7, 8 Fernando Fonseca de Almeida-Val 1– 4 1 Department of Physiological Sciences, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 2 Cardiopulmonary Laboratory, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital, UFAM, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 3 Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado Tropical Medicine Foundation, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 4 Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Respiratory and Cardiovascular Physiotherapy Laboratory, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 5 Higher School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 6 Francisca Mendes University Hospital, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 7 Leônidas and Maria Deane Institute, Fiocruz Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil; 8 University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA Correspondence: Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Universidade Federal Do Amazonas, Avenida Rodrigo Otávio, 6200, Manaus, AM, 69080-900, Brasil, Email Background: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) seems to be a better choice to improve physical and functional capacity after acute infection. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effects of different strategies to optimize post-acute phase rehabilitation and reduce long COVID-19 physical deteriorations. Objective: To compare the use of a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) plus aerobic exercise strategy during PR program with to a standard PR (without NIV) on physical capacity and quality of life outcomes in post-COVID-19. Methods: Double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 individuals discharged from hospital in a post-acute phase of severe COVID-19 will be randomized into two groups: PR + NIV (Group 1) and PR (Group 2). Inclusion criteria include participants who present symptomatic dyspnea II and III by the modified Medical Research Council, aged 18 years or older. Both groups will receive aerobic and resistance exercise, and inspiratory muscle training. However, group 1 will perform aerobic training with bilevel NIV. Cardiopulmonary exercise test will assess the O 2 peak uptake, 6-minute walk test will assess the walking distance and short-form 36 will assess the quality of life before and after 8 weeks (after 24 PR sessions). Moreover, patients will be contacted by telephone every 3 months for one year to record possible adverse events, hospitalizations, and death. All data will be registered in RedCap, and analyses will be performed in the STATA v13 software. Clinical Trial Registration: RBR-3t9pkzt. Keywords: COVID-19, noninvasive ventilation, pulmonary rehabilitation Field experts have recommended pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), focusing mainly on physical exercise guided by physical therapists in post-COVID-19. 1–3 Until now, no clinical trial has observed the effect of therapeutic exercise on the physical rehabilitation of post-COVID-19. However, the large volume of studies with positive effects of PR in patients diagnosed with chronic pulmonary disease has prompted the scientific community for an external validity of a post-acute phase of COVID-19 adapted PR. 2,4 A strategy to enhance exercise tolerance in aerobic training within PR is the use of ventilatory pressurized modalities during aerobic exercise, as the bilevel noninvasive ventilation (NIV). 5–7 Studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) 7–9 have evidenced reduced intolerance to efforts during aerobic exercise training and improvement of the physical and functional capacity after physical training using a PR plus NIV strategy. However, positive effects are not widely observed in all pulmonary conditions. For instance, patients with different chronic respiratory failure diseases 10 have been shown not to improve functional capacity after aerobic training associated NIV compared to aerobic training alone. 5,11 Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of a bilevel NIV during aerobic training may significantly improve e -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services