Six-month outcomes and effect of pulmonary rehabilitation among patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

Yaoshan Dun,Chao Liu,Jeffrey W. Ripley-Gonzalez,Ping Liu,Nanjiang Zhou,Xun Gong,Baiyang You,Yang Du,Jiyang Liu,Bo Li,Suixin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.2001043
IF: 5.348
2021-01-01
Annals of Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patients appear to maintain sequelae post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affecting daily life and physical health. We investigated the changes in and the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise capacity and immunology six months after COVID-19 hospitalization.METHODS: This retrospective cohort reviewed 233 COVID-19 patients admitted from 17 January 2020 to 29 February 2020. Ninety-eight patients who completed 2-week and 6-month follow-ups and tests were included. Among 98 patients, 27 completed at least five sessions of PR at the First Hospital of Changsha, China, during the 6-month convalescence were allocated to the PR group; the reminder who had not performed any PR were assigned to the control group. The primary outcome was the change in six-minute walk distance (6-MWD) between the 2-week and 6-month follow-ups, which was assessed via analysis of covariance with a covariate of propensity score that adjusted for the potential confounders. Secondary outcomes were the changes in 6-MWD, SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins, T-lymphocytes and blood chemistry, which were evaluated via paired tests.RESULTS: Participants' ages ranged from 19 to 84 years (<i>M</i> = 47, standard deviation (SD)=15) 45.9% identified as male. During the 6-month convalescence, 6-MWD increased 27.0%, with a mean [95% CI] of 113 [92-134] m (<i>p &lt;</i> .001). SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM decreased 33.3% (<i>p</i> = .002) and 43.8% (<i>p</i> = .009), CD4+ T cells increased 7.9% (<i>p</i> = .04), and the majority of blood chemistry significantly changed. The patients in the PR group acquired a greater increase in 6-MWD than those in control (unadjusted, 194 [167-221] m, <i>p</i> &lt; .001; adjusted, 123 [68-181] m, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), dose-responsiveness of PR on 6-MWD was observed (<i>p &lt;</i> .001). No differences in immunity variables and blood chemistry were observed between groups.CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest PR may be a strategy to promote the improvement of exercise capacity after COVID-19.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?