Abstract:The MethaneSAT satellite instrument and its aircraft precursor, MethaneAIR, are imaging spectrometers designed to measure methane concentrations with wide spatial coverage, fine spatial resolution, and high precision compared to currently deployed remote sensing instruments. At 12 960 m cruise altitude above ground (13 850 m above sea level), MethaneAIR datasets have a 4.5 km swath gridded to 10 m × 10 m pixels with 17–20 ppb standard deviation on a flat scene. MethaneAIR was deployed in the summer of 2021 in the Permian Basin to test the accuracy of the retrieved methane concentrations and emission rates using the algorithms developed for MethaneSAT. We report here point source emissions obtained during a single-blind volume-controlled release experiment, using two methods. (1) The modified integrated mass enhancement (mIME) method estimates emission rates using the total mass enhancement of methane in an observed plume combined with winds obtained from Weather Research Forecast driven by High-Resolution Rapid Refresh meteorological data in Large Eddy Simulations mode (WRF-LES-HRRR). WRF-LES-HRRR simulates winds in stochastic eddy-scale (100–1000 m) variability, which is particularly important for low-wind conditions and informing the error budget. The mIME can estimate emission rates of plumes of any size that are detectable by MethaneAIR. (2) The divergence integral (DI) method applies Gauss's theorem to estimate the flux divergence fields through a series of closed surfaces enclosing the sources. The set of boxes grows from the upwind side of the plume through the core of each plume and downwind. No selection of inflow concentration, as used in the mIME, is required. The DI approach can efficiently determine fluxes from large sources and clusters of sources but cannot resolve small point emissions. These methods account for the effects of eddy-scale variation in different ways: the DI averages across many eddies, whereas the mIME re-samples many eddies from the LES simulation. The DI directly uses HRRR winds, while mIME uses WRF-LES-HRRR wind products. Emissions estimates from both the mIME and DI methods agreed closely with the single-blind volume-controlled experiments ( N = 21). The York regression between the estimated emissions and the released emissions has a slope of 0.96 [0.84, 1.08], R = 0.83 and N = 21, with 30 % mean percentage error for the whole dataset, which indicates that MethaneAIR can quantify point sources emitting more than 200 kg h −1 for the mIME and 500 kg h −1 for the DI method. The two methods also agreed on methane emission estimates from various uncontrolled sources in the Permian Basin. The experiment thus demonstrates the powerful potential of the MethaneAIR instrument and suggests that the quantification method should be transferable to MethaneSAT if it meets the design specifications.

Probability of Detection and Multi-Sensor Persistence of Methane Emissions from Coincident Airborne and Satellite Observations

Single-blind validation of space-based point-source detection and quantification of onshore methane emissions

Quantifying Methane Emissions from the Global Scale Down to Point Sources Using Satellite Observations of Atmospheric Methane

Single-blind test of nine methane-sensing satellite systems from three continents

Evaluating the detectability of methane point sources from satellite observing systems using microscale modeling

Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions

Autonomous Detection of Methane Emissions in Multispectral Satellite Data Using Deep Learning

Methane Retrieval Algorithms Based on Satellite: A Review

Enhanced monitoring of atmospheric methane from space over the Permian basin with hierarchical Bayesian inference

AI for operational methane emitter monitoring from space

Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Matched-Filter-Based Gas Detection With Imaging Spectroscopy

Methane point source quantification using MethaneAIR: a new airborne imaging spectrometer

Using a satellite-aircraft hybrid system based on the same sensor to monitor oil and gas facilities for methane emissions

Deployment-invariant probability of detection characterization for aerial LiDAR methane detection

Daily detection and quantification of methane leaks using Sentinel-3: a tiered satellite observation approach with Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-5p

Automated detection of regions with persistently enhanced methane concentrations using Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite data

Detection, localization, and quantification of single-source methane emissions on oil and gas production sites using point-in-space continuous monitoring systems

A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation

Technological Maturity of Aircraft-Based Methane Sensing for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Locating and Quantifying Methane Emissions by Inverse Analysis of Path-Integrated Concentration Data Using a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Approach

Emission Source Detection and Leak Rate Estimation Using Point Measurements of Concentration