Abstract:INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) recovery after major abdominal surgery can be delayed from an ongoing need for narcotic analgesia thereby prolonging hospitalization. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to facilitate early recovery after major surgery by maintaining preoperative body composition and physiological organ function and modifying the stress response induced by surgical exposure. Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery have decreased the duration of postoperative ileus and the hospital stay while showing equivalent morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates in comparison to the traditional standard of care. This study is a pilot trial to evaluate the benefits of ERAS protocols in living kidney donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.METHODS: This is a single-center, non-randomized, retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes of the first 40 live kidney donors subjected to laparoscopic nephrectomy under the ERAS protocol to 40 donors operated prior to ERAS with traditional standard of care. Our ERAS protocol includes reduced duration of fasting with preoperative carbohydrate loading, intraoperative fluid restriction to 3 ml/kg/hr, target urine output of 0.5 ml/kg/hr, use of subfascial Exparel injection (bupivacaine liposome suspension), and postoperative narcotic-free pain regimen with acetaminophen, ketorolac, or tramadol. Short-term patient outcomes were compared using Pearsons's Chi-Squared test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate factors influencing patient length of stay and likelihood of readmission.RESULTS: ERAS protocol reduced the postoperative median length of stay decreased from 2.0 to 1.0 days (p=0.001). Overall pain scores were significantly lower in the ERAS group (peak pain score 6.0 vs. 8.00, p< 0.001; morning after surgery pain score 3.0 vs. 7.0, p=0.001; lowest pain score 0.0 vs. 2.0, p=0.016) despite the absence of postoperative narcotics. The average duration of surgery was shorter in the ERAS group (248 vs. 304 minutes, p<0.001). The average amount of intraoperative fluid used was significantly lower in the ERAS group (2500 ml vs. 3525 ml, p<0.001) without affecting the donor renal function. The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in the two groups (p=0.541). A trend toward lower readmission was noted with the ERAS protocol (12.8% vs. 27.5%, p=0.105). GI dysfunction was the most common reason for readmission.CONCLUSION: Application of an ERAS protocol in a laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy was associated with reduced length of hospitalization and improved pain scores related likely to intraoperative use of subfascial Exparel and a shorter duration of ileus. Restricted use of intraoperative fluids prevents excessive third spacing and bowel edema, enhancing gut recovery without adversely impacting recipient graft function. This study suggests that ERAS has the potential to enhance the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for live kidney donation through optimizing donor outcomes and perioperative patient satisfaction.

Quality of Life, Pain and Return to Normal Activities Following Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Versus Open Mini-Incision Donor Nephrectomy

Quality of Life Following Living Donor Nephrectomy Comparing Classical Flank Incision and Anterior Vertical Mini-Incision.

Anterior Vertical Mini‐incision Vs. Retroperitoneoscopic Nephrectomy in Living Kidney Donation: a Prospective Study on Donors' Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome

Measuring surgical recovery: the study of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Living Donor Nephrectomy: Flank Incision Versus Anterior Vertical Mini-Incision

Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy:A Report of 68 Cases

Outcomes and Cost Comparison of 3 Different Laparoscopic Approach for Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of 551 Cases

Impact of Living Donor Nephrectomy on the Early Kidney Function for Donors

Comprehensive Surgical Audit of Live-Related Donor Nephrectomy: Procedural Parameters, Demographics, Health Assessments, Complications, and Postoperative Outcomes

Comparison of Single Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy and Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

A Comparison of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Operation for Donor Nephrectomy in Living Renal Transplantation

Health-related Quality of Life after Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Radical Nephrectomies of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Is Right Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Right?

Technical Considerations in Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Initial Taiwan Experience from National Taiwan University Hospital.

Comparison of the surgical approaches for nephrectomy in living related donors]

Could the Use of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Be an Incentive for Live Kidney Donation?

Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Comparison of Surgical Techniques in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Does Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy Surgical Living Donor Nephrectomy Satisfy Donors?

Standard laparoscopic vs laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidney: a comparison of therapeutic outcomes

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.