Abstract:Objective To report our initial experience on the complications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy(RPLDN)and their managements in 117 cases.Methods From December 2003 to January 2009,117 cases of RPLDNs were carried out in our hospital.The operation was performed through 3 lumbar ports,after the kidney was liberated fully and the ureter was severed 7-8 cm under the lower pole of the kidney,the renal artery and vein were blocked with Endo-cut or Hem-o-lok and then cut off.Endo-cut was used in 3 patients and Hem-o-lok in 114 donors.Afterwards,the kidney was taken out quickly from the donor and infused with 4℃ kidney preserving fluid(HCA)immediately.We reviewed the intraoperative and postoperative complications in the donors and the grafts and the managements of the cases.Results All the 117 operations were successfully completed.No patients died during the operation or had delayed graft function recovery postoperation.No one was converted to an open surgery or needed blood transfusion during the procedure.Surgery-related complications occurred in 5 donors(4.3%)including intraoperative bleeding in 2(cured by hemostasis during the operation)and retroperitoneal hematoma in 3(cured by conservative management).Graft-related complications occurred in 8(6.8%)cases;among which extra arteries in the graft owning to endovascular stapler was found in 1 patient(who had a short common stem of the main renal artery,the three branches were anastomosed with the external iliac artery and 2 branches of internal iliac artery respectively);two graft kidneys were lacerated by laparoscopic instruments superficially and were repaired using absorbable sutures;renal subcapsular hematoma was noted in 2 grafts,capsulotomy was performed in one of them while the other received no treatment,both the cases had normal function of the transplanted kidneys;ureteral complications occurred in 3 grafts,in which vesico-urethral anastomotic leakage was developed in 10 days after withdrawal of the double J stents,they were cured by ureteral re-implantation.All the donors and recipients with complications were followed up for an average of 50 months(range 15-62 months).No other complications were found in the cases.During the follow-up,blood and urine routine,liver and renal functions,and blood glucose level are all in a normal range,abdominal B-ultrasonography revealed no abnormalities.B-ultrasonography of the implanted kidneys showed normal morphology and renal functions.Conclusions RPLDN is a safe and reliable method.Most of its complications complications may be attributed to the learning curve.Refinements in surgical techniques may decrease the rates of both donor and graft complications.

Comparing Surgical Complications of Donors and Recipients in Retroperitoneoscopic versus Mini-Incision Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Structured Introduction of Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Provides a High Level of Safety and Reduces the Physical Burden for the Donor Compared to an Anterior Mini Incision: A Cohort Study.

Anterior Vertical Mini‐incision Vs. Retroperitoneoscopic Nephrectomy in Living Kidney Donation: a Prospective Study on Donors' Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome

Living Donor Nephrectomy: Flank Incision Versus Anterior Vertical Mini-Incision

Safety and graft outcome of right retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living donor kidney transplantation: A comparison with left retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Comparison of Both Sides for Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Experience from a Single Center in China.

Quality of Life Following Living Donor Nephrectomy Comparing Classical Flank Incision and Anterior Vertical Mini-Incision.

Complications of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

Robotic versus open mini-incision living donor nephrectomy: Single centre experience

Comparison of Single Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy and Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

Outcomes and Cost Comparison of 3 Different Laparoscopic Approach for Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of 551 Cases

TECHNICAL MODIFICATIONS OF RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: CHINESE EXPERIENCE

Retroperitoneoscopic Live-donor Right Nephrectomy: A Chinese Single Center

Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Via Retroperitoneal Approach: a Report of 32 Cases

Retroperitoneoscopic Live-Donor Nephrectomy: 5-Year Single-Center Experience In China

Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Learning Curve for Modified Retroperitoneoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy

Right and left living donor nephrectomy and operative approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of donor and recipient outcomes

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a cost-effective approach.

[Technical Improvement in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Report of 193 Cases].

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: superior outcomes after completion of the learning curve

Effective and safe implementation of robot‐assisted donor nephrectomy by experienced laparoscopic surgeons