Abstract:Background: Oral microflora containing microorganisms is responsible for the majority of orodental diseases as well as post-endodontic treatment failure. Even in the ideal root canal treatment cases, a small number of viable bacteria will remain in the dentinal tubule hence come the role of root canal sealers, which must offer and possess some degree of antimicrobial activity alongside adequate flowability to ensure excellent sealing of all lateral dentinal tubule canals to prevent the possibility of future reinfection. The present study aimed to examine the antibacterial efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) using an agar diffusion test (ADT) at different time intervals, as well as the flow characteristics of three different root canal sealers: Endofill (Produits Dentaires SA, Vevey, Switzerland), AH Plus (Dentsply De Trey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), and the newly introduced GuttaFlow2 (Coltène/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). Materials and methods: The antibacterial activity and flow characteristics of three root canal sealers, Endofill, AH Plus, and GuttaFlow2, were tested using ADT at three different time intervals (24 hours, 48 hours, and seven days). For this purpose, E. faecalis strains were used as the pathogen in this study. Flow characteristics were done using the standard flow test protocol recommended for endodontic sealers. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The results for antibacterial activity showed a statistically significant difference between Endofill and the other groups (p < 0.05). The antibacterial activity of Endofill increased over time from 24 hours to 48 hours and seven days. AH Plus demonstrated antibacterial activity only within the first 24 hours of mixing, while GuttaFlow2 showed no inhibition zones against E. faecalis. Regarding the flow test results, the Endofill group recorded the lowest flow values compared to GuttaFlow2 and AH Plus, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between GuttaFlow2 and AH Plus for flow values. Conclusion: Endofill demonstrated the highest antibacterial activity at all time intervals, while GuttaFlow2 showed no antimicrobial activity. AH Plus exhibited antimicrobial effects only within the first 24 hours of mixing. In terms of flow values, Endofill had the lowest flow, whereas GuttaFlow2 and AH Plus had the highest flow values.

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials guttaflow, resilon and thermafil: an in vitro study.

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three bioactive obturation materials: A bacterial leakage study

Comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: An In vitro study

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of the Marginal Adaptation of Various Root Canal Sealers at the Dentin-Sealer and Sealer-Guttapercha Interfaces at Three Root Canal Levels: An In Vitro Study

In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: A bacterial microleakage study

Evaluation of Apical Leakage After Root Canal Obturation with Glass Ionomer, Resin, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Sealers Combined with Thermafil

A study to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of MTA, Biodentine, and TotalFill BC RRM Putty in simulated immature teeth

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of a BioCeramic Sealer (iRoot SP) with AH Plus Sealer with Root Canal Dentin Using Three Different Techniques of Sealer Application: A Combined Dye Extraction and Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Comparative Analysis of Antibacterial Efficacy and Flow Characteristics of Three Root Canal Sealers

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of two self-adhesive flowable composites following various restorative techniques in Class V lesions: An in vitro study

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and AH Plus sealers in laterally condensed gutta percha: A dye leakage study

Comparison of Root End Sealing Ability of Three Retrograde Filling Materials in Teeth with Root Apices Resected at 90° using Dye Penetration Method under Fluorescent Microscope: An In-vitro Study

Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE Using 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% Citric Acid as Irrigants-An In Vitro Study

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Comparative evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a ceramic based sealer and MTA as root-end filling materials – An in-vitro study

Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique

Assessment of microleakage in root canals sealed with an experimental endodontic composite

The Influence of Smear Layer and Different Sealers on Apical Microleakage of Root Canals Obturated with Ultrafil-3D System

Evaluation of sealing ability of four bioceramic root canal sealers and an epoxy resin-based sealer: An in vivo study

An In Vitro Microleakage Study for Comparative Analysis of Two Types of Resin-based Sealants Placed by Using Three Different Types of Techniques of Enamel Preparation