Abstract:Aims An in vitro evaluation of the marginal adaptation of four root canal sealer variants at the dentin-sealer and sealer gutta-percha interfaces in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals was conducted using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis. Materials and methods In total, 80 extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. All teeth were decoronated to standardize the root length to 14 mm. A round bur was used to gain access into canal orifices and the working length was determined. Root canal instrumentation was performed using the crown-down technique with ProTaper Next rotary files up to size X3, along with the use of root canal irrigants. All specimens were then randomly divided into four groups, with 20 specimens per group, depending on the root canal sealer used: Group A consisted of AH Plus (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Group B of MTA-Fillapex (Angelus Dental, Londrina, Brazil), Group C of Bio-C Sealer (Angelus Dental), and Group D of GuttaFlow-2 (Coltene Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland). All specimens were obturated with size X3 gutta-percha points uniformly coated with respective sealers in the single-cone technique and coronal access was sealed with glass ionomer cement. The specimens were incubated for seven days and then horizontally sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canals. On each sample obtained, three points were randomly chosen and both sealer-dentin and sealer gutta-percha interfaces were examined under FESEM at 1000x magnification. The marginal gaps of all four sealers at both interfaces and at three levels of root canals were measured in µm and values were recorded, tabulated, and used for data analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Compared to the sealer gutta-percha interface, AH Plus, MTA-Fillapex, and Bio-C sealers at all three levels of the root canals showed more marginal gaps at the sealer-dentin interface with a significant difference (p<0.05). However, the GuttaFlow-2 sealer showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusions The marginal adaptation of the GuttaFlow-2 sealer is superior to both dentin and gutta-percha at the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals compared to other sealers used in the study.

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and AH Plus sealers in laterally condensed gutta percha: A dye leakage study

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Kinds Endodontic Materials As Root Canal Sealers

Evaluation of Apical Leakage After Root Canal Obturation with Glass Ionomer, Resin, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Sealers Combined with Thermafil

Comparison of apical sealing ability between bioceramic and zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer during root canal treatment, in vitro

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of a BioCeramic Sealer (iRoot SP) with AH Plus Sealer with Root Canal Dentin Using Three Different Techniques of Sealer Application: A Combined Dye Extraction and Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE Using 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% Citric Acid as Irrigants-An In Vitro Study

Sealing ability and obturation quality of root canals filled with gutta-percha and two different sealers

Comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: An In vitro study

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of the Marginal Adaptation of Various Root Canal Sealers at the Dentin-Sealer and Sealer-Guttapercha Interfaces at Three Root Canal Levels: An In Vitro Study

Quantitative analysis of endodontic microleakage of 5 different sealers in vitro

[Periapical Microleakage of Root Canals Filled with Four Kinds of Sealers Using Two Obturation Techniques].

Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of sealing ability of four bioceramic root canal sealers and an epoxy resin-based sealer: An in vivo study

Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study

Assessment of microleakage in root canals sealed with an experimental endodontic composite

Comparative Analysis of Coronal Sealing Materials in Endodontics: Exploring Non-Eugenol Zinc Oxide-Based versus Glass-Ionomer Cement Systems

In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: A bacterial microleakage study

Comparative evaluation of penetration of sealers in dentinal tubules using passive ultrasonic irrigation and Erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser - A confocal laser scanning microscope study

In vitro study of coronal leakage after post space preparation

Microscopic Appearance and Apical Seal of Root Canals Filled with Gutta-Percha and ProRoot Endo Sealer after Immersion in a Phosphate-Containing Fluid.