Abstract:Root canal therapy is a crucial procedure in endodontics that is done to achieve complete obliteration of the root canal space. The success of this therapy depends on achieving a proper seal, which is facilitated using root canal sealers. This study aimed to compare the apical sealing ability of three different root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex, AH Plus, and zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), using the dye penetration method. Forty freshly extracted single-rooted human maxillary incisors were collected and prepared for the study. The root canals were instrumented using the ProTaper system, and the canals were then obturated using the lateral condensation technique with the respective sealers. After one week of storage, the samples were coated with nail varnish, immersed in a rhodamine B dye solution, and then sectioned longitudinally. The depth of dye penetration was measured, and the results were analyzed statistically. The results revealed significant differences in apical leakage among the three experimental groups. Group 2 (AH Plus) showed the minimum leakage with a mean of 0.13 mm, while Group 4 (no sealer) exhibited the maximum leakage with a mean of 4.49 mm. Group 3 (ZOE) showed an intermediate level of leakage with a mean of 2.37 mm. The statistical analysis confirmed the significant difference in mean leakage among the groups. The findings of this study indicate that AH Plus exhibited superior apical sealing ability compared to MTA Fillapex and ZOE. AH Plus is a resin-based sealer known for its dimensional stability. On the other hand, MTA Fillapex, a newly introduced sealer containing mineral trioxide aggregate, resin, and silica, showed promising sealing properties but had slightly higher leakage compared to AH Plus. ZOE, a traditional sealer, demonstrated relatively higher leakage than the other sealers. In conclusion, choosing a root canal sealer is crucial in achieving a successful endodontic treatment outcome. AH Plus demonstrated superior apical sealing ability among the three sealers tested. Further research and long-term clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess the impact of sealer choice on treatment outcomes and post-endodontic healing.

Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: An in vitro study

Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Warm Vertical Compaction with Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Comparison of apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer using the fluid filtration technique and scanning electron microscopy

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of a BioCeramic Sealer (iRoot SP) with AH Plus Sealer with Root Canal Dentin Using Three Different Techniques of Sealer Application: A Combined Dye Extraction and Scanning Electron Microscope Study

Comparison of sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus, and guttaflow in conservatively prepared curved root canals obturated with single-cone technique: An In vitro study

Evaluation of sealing ability of four bioceramic root canal sealers and an epoxy resin-based sealer: An in vivo study

In vitro comparative evaluation of apical leakage using a bioceramic sealer with three different obturating techniques: A glucose leakage model

Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE Using 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% Citric Acid as Irrigants-An In Vitro Study

Comparison of apical sealing ability between bioceramic and zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer during root canal treatment, in vitro

Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography

In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of three newly developed root canal sealers: A bacterial microleakage study

Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the root dentin bond strength and intratubular biomineralization of a premixed calcium aluminate-based hydraulic bioceramic endodontic sealer

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three bioactive obturation materials: A bacterial leakage study

Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers

Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Assessment of A New Root Canal Sealer'S Apical Sealing Ability

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and AH Plus sealers in laterally condensed gutta percha: A dye leakage study

Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Kinds Endodontic Materials As Root Canal Sealers