Abstract:Objectives: Measurement of outcomes has become increasingly important to assess the benefit of audiologic rehabilitation, including hearing aids, in adults. Data from questionnaires, however, are based on retrospective recall of events and experiences, and often can be inaccurate. Questionnaires also do not capture the daily variation that typically occurs in relevant events and experiences. Clinical researchers in a variety of fields have turned to a methodology known as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess quotidian experiences associated with health problems. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using EMA to obtain real-time responses from hearing aid users describing their experiences with challenging hearing situations. Design: This study required three phases: (1) develop EMA methodology to assess hearing difficulties experienced by hearing aid users; (2) make use of focus groups to refine the methodology; and (3) test the methodology with 24 hearing aid users. Phase 3 participants carried a personal digital assistant 12 hr per day for 2 weeks. The personal digital assistant alerted participants to respond to questions four times a day. Each assessment started with a question to determine whether a hearing problem was experienced since the last alert. If "yes," then up to 23 questions (depending on contingent response branching) obtained details about the situation. If "no," then up to 11 questions obtained information that would help to explain why hearing was not a problem. Each participant completed the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) both before and after the 2-week EMA testing period to evaluate for "reactivity" (exacerbation of self-perceived hearing problems that could result from the repeated assessments). Results: Participants responded to the alerts with a 77% compliance rate, providing a total of 991 completed momentary assessments (mean = 43.1 per participant). A substantial amount of data were obtained with the methodology. It is important to note that participants reported a "hearing problem situation since the last alert" 37.6% of the time (372 responses). The most common problem situation involved "face-to-face conversation" (53.8% of the time). The next most common problem situation was "telephone conversation" (17.2%) followed by "TV, radio, iPod, etc." (15.3%), "environmental sounds" (9.7%), and "movies, lecture, etc." (4.0%). Comparison of pre- and post-EMA mean HHIE scores revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05), indicating that reactivity did not occur for this group. It should be noted, however, that 37.5% of participants reported a greater sense of awareness regarding their hearing loss and use of hearing aids. Conclusions: Results showed participants were compliant, gave positive feedback, and did not demonstrate reactivity based on pre- and post-HHIE scores. We conclude that EMA methodology is feasible with patients who use hearing aids and could potentially inform hearing healthcare (HHC) services. The next step is to develop and evaluate EMA protocols that provide detailed daily patient information to audiologists at each stage of HHC. The advantages of such an approach would be to obtain real-life outcome measures, and to determine within- and between-day variability in outcomes and associated factors. Such information at present is not available from patients who seek and use HHC services.

Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

Pilot feasibility of an mHealth system for conducting ecological momentary assessment of mood-related symptoms following traumatic brain injury

Ecological Momentary Assessment in Behavioral Research: Addressing Technological and Human Participant Challenges

Initial Validation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measure of Self-Efficacy to Manage Negative Emotions

Ecological Momentary Assessments of Trauma-Related Intrusive Memories: Potential Clinical Utility

Investigating Best Practices for Ecological Momentary Assessment: Nationwide Factorial Experiment

The feasibility and acceptability of assessing inhibitory control and working memory among adolescents via an ecological momentary assessment approach

Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users

Building an ecological momentary assessment smartphone app for 4- to 10-year-old children: A pilot study

Patterns of Missing Data with Ecological Momentary Assessment: Feasibility Report from a Pilot Study of People Who Use Drugs.

Remote Symptom Monitoring With Ecological Momentary Computerized Adaptive Testing: Pilot Cohort Study of a Platform for Frequent, Low-Burden, and Personalized Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Ecological momentary assessment in prolonged grief research: Feasibility, acceptability, and measurement reactivity

Response Rate Patterns in Adolescents With Concussion Using Mobile Health and Remote Patient Monitoring: Observational Study

Adaptive data collection for intra-individual studies affected by adherence

Acceptability and feasibility of ecological momentary assessment with augmentation of passive sensor data in young adults at high risk for suicide

Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults

Compliance to a cell phone-based ecological momentary assessment study: The effect of time and personality characteristics.

Ecological Momentary Assessment versus Weekly Questionnaire Assessment of Change in Depression

The feasibility and acceptability of mobile health monitoring for real-time assessment of traumatic injury outcomes

Measurement of Sleep in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship Between Self-report and Actigraphy

Identification of careless responding in ecological momentary assessment research: From posthoc analyses to real-time data monitoring.