Abstract:Background: Patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke presenting with milder baseline clinical severity are common and require endovascular thrombectomy. However, such patients are difficult to recognize using pre-hospital severity-based triage tools and therefore are likely to require a secondary inter-hospital transfer if transported to a non-thrombectomy center. Given the potential for milder severity to represent better underlying cerebrovascular collateral circulation, it is unknown whether transfer delays are still associated with poorer post-stroke outcomes in this patient group. Aims: We primarily aimed to examine whether the harmful effect of inter-hospital transfer delay for thrombectomy was different for LVO patients with mild or severe deficits. Secondarily, we also investigated whether imaging markers of collateral circulation were different between severity groups. Methods: Registry data from two large Australian thrombectomy centers was used to identify all directly presenting and secondarily transferred LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy, divided into those with lower (NIHSS <10) and higher (NIHSS ≥10) baseline deficits. The primary outcome was functional independence or return to baseline defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2 or baseline at 90-days. Patients with complete baseline CT-perfusion data were analyzed for imaging markers of collateral circulation by baseline severity group. Results: A total of n=1210 LVO patients undergoing thrombectomy were included, of which 273 (22.6%) had lower baseline severity. Despite similar thrombolysis and recanalization rates, transferred patients had lower odds of achieving the primary outcome compared to primary presentation to a thrombectomy-center, where baseline severity was higher (aOR 0.759 [95% CI 0.576-0.999]), but not when severity was lower (aOR 1.357 [95% CI 0.764-2.409], p-interaction=0.122). In the imaging analysis of n=436 patients, those with milder severity showed smaller median ischemic core volumes (12.6 [IQR 0.0-17.9] vs 27.5 [IQR 6.5-37.1] mL, p<0.001)), higher median perfusion mismatch ratio (10.8 [IQR 4.8-54.5] vs 6.6 [IQR 3.5-16.5], p<0.001) and lower median hypoperfusion intensity ratio (0.25 [IQR 0.18-0.38] vs 0.40 [IQR 0.22-0.57], p<0.001). Discussion: Patients receiving secondary inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy had poorer outcomes compared to those presenting directly to a thrombectomy-center if baseline deficits were severe, but this difference was not observed when baseline deficits were milder. This result may potentially be due to our secondary findings of significantly improved collateral circulation markers in lower severity LVO patients. As such, failure of pre-hospital screening tools to detect lower-severity LVO patients for pre-hospital bypass to a thrombectomy center may not necessarily deleteriously affect outcome. Data access statement: Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.

"Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes

Abstract WP22: "Chopperlysis:" Improved Functional Outcomes Associated With Helicopter Transport in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients Treated With Tenecteplase

Exploring the Relationship Between Ischemic Core Volume and Clinical Outcomes after Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis

Arterial Recanalization During Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy

Abstract TMP91: Clinical Change During Inter-Hospital Transfer for Thrombectomy: Incidence, Associated Factors and Relationship With Outcome

Large vessel occlusive stroke with milder baseline severity show better collaterals and reduced harm from thrombectomy transfer delays

Abstract TP149: Pretreatment Parameters Predicting Excellent Recanalization of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical change during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy: Incidence, associated factors, and relationship with outcome

The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy

Influence of vascular imaging acquisition at local stroke centers on workflows in the drip-n-ship model: a RACECAT post hoc analysis

Abstract 82: The Association of Transfer Status and Time on Clinical and Imaging Outcomes in Large Core Strokes: A SELECT2 Subanlaysis

Effect of time delay in inter-hospital transfer on outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Interfacility Transfer for Thrombectomy: A Promising Therapeutic Window

Stroke transfers for thrombectomy in the era of extended time

Tenecteplase versus alteplase before stroke thrombectomy: outcomes after system-wide transitions in Pennsylvania

Abstract WMP11: Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients Without versus With Visible Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial

Outcomes of Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Endovascular Therapy Alone in Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract WP15: Short-Term Functional Outcomes Of Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions Transported By Mobile Stroke Unit Compared To Conventional Transport.

Abstract NS2: An Expedited Transfer Process Improves Door In Door Out Times

Single-step Optimization in Triaging Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: Identifying Factors to Improve Door-to-groin Time for Endovascular Therapy

Abstract WP117: Improvement of Collateral Status in Thrombectomy-Eligible Stroke Patients During Inter-Hospital Transfer: Association With Clinical Factors and Outcome