Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Validating the Teacher Version of Pediatric Symptom Checklist–17 in Chinese Elementary Schools

[Development of Chinese Version of Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale].

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

Reversion of Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale in Chinese Preschoolers: Validity and Reliability

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Results of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China

Revisiting the 8-syndrome of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in 67257 Chinese school students

Validity studies of a parent-completed social-emotional measure in a representative sample in China

Reliability and Validity of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in Chinese Children

Measuring Adolescent Psychopathology: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

Norms of The Conners Parent Symptom Questionnaire in Chinese Urban Children

Social Competence and Behavior Problems in Chinese Preschoolers

Validation of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children and Prevalence of Parent-Reported Sleep Disorder Symptoms in Chinese Children.

Validation of the Self-Regulation Scale in Chinese Children

Validity and Reliability Analysis of the Chinese Parent Version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 Years)

Cross-Cultural Revision and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (2–5 Years)

Modifying the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 Years) to a Chinese Context: an Exploratory Factor Analysis

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the kiddie-schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5)

Reliability and Validity of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents

The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire