Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

[Development of Chinese Version of Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale].

Chinese Version of a Face Version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale: Transcultural Adaptation and Evaluation

Dental Fear and Its Possible Relationship with Periodontal Status in Chinese Adults: A Preliminary Study

The Establishment of the Chinese Version of the Dental Hygiene Fear Survey

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Translation and Validation of the Short Form of the Fear of Dental Pain Questionnaire in China

Prevalence and risk factors of children’s dental anxiety in China: a longitudinal study

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the multidimensional anxiety scale for children among Chinese secondary school students

Validating the Teacher Version of Pediatric Symptom Checklist–17 in Chinese Elementary Schools

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

[Establishment and Evaluation of a Scale Method for Rating Children's Behavior in Dental Clinic in China].

Children's Temperament Characteristics and Dental Fear

Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese (mandarin) Version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) for School-Age Children

Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Chinese version of the Child Food Neophobia Scale

Assessing Fears in Anxiety-Disordered Children With the Revised Fear Survey Schedule for Children (FSSC-R)

The Short Form of the Fear Survey Schedule for Children-Revised (FSSC-R-SF): An efficient, reliable, and valid scale for measuring fear in children and adolescents

Children’s dental fear and anxiety: exploring family related factors

Development and reliability and validity test of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS)