Season, prey availability, sex, and age explain prey size selection in a large solitary carnivore

Logan Bates‐Mundell,Sara H. Williams,Kim Sager‐Fradkin,Heiko U. Wittmer,Maximilian L. Allen,Bogdan Cristescu,Christopher C. Wilmers,L. Mark Elbroch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11080
IF: 3.167
2024-03-08
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:Season, prey availability, and age influence the size of prey selected by pumas across six sites in North and South America. The optimal prey size for pumas appears context‐dependent, although evidence suggests it is smaller than predicted by ecological theory. Males and females killed similar‐sized prey, even though males are much larger, and males more than females killed larger prey as they aged. Prey selection is a fundamental aspect of ecology that drives evolution and community structure, yet the impact of intraspecific variation on the selection for prey size remains largely unaccounted for in ecological theory. Here, we explored puma (Puma concolor) prey selection across six study sites in North and South America. Our results highlighted the strong influence of season and prey availability on puma prey selection, and the smaller influence of puma age. Pumas in all sites selected smaller prey in warmer seasons following the ungulate birth pulse. Our top models included interaction terms between sex and age, suggesting that males more than females select larger prey as they age, which may reflect experiential learning. When accounting for variable sampling across pumas in our six sites, male and female pumas killed prey of equivalent size, even though males are larger than females, challenging assumptions about this species. Nevertheless, pumas in different study sites selected prey of different sizes, emphasizing that the optimal prey size for pumas is likely context‐dependent and affected by prey availability. The mean prey weight across all sites averaged 1.18 times mean puma weight, which was less than predicted as the optimal prey size by energetics and ecological theory (optimal prey = 1.45 puma weight). Our results help refine our understanding of optimal prey for pumas and other solitary carnivores, as well as corroborate recent research emphasizing that carnivore prey selection is impacted not just by energetics but by the effects of diverse ecology.
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?