Abstract:To manage predation risk, prey navigate a dynamic landscape of fear, or spatiotemporal variation in risk perception, reflecting predator distributions, traits, and activity cycles. Prey may seek to reduce risk across this landscape using habitat at times and in places when predators are less active. In multipredator landscapes, avoiding one predator could increase vulnerability to another, making the landscape of fear difficult to predict and navigate. Additionally, humans may shape interactions between predators and prey, and induce new sources of risk. Humans can function as a shield, providing a refuge for prey from human‐averse carnivores, and as a predator, causing mortality through hunting and vehicle collisions and eliciting a fear response that can exceed that of carnivores. We used telemetry data collected between 2017 and 2021 from 63 Global Positioning System‐collared elk (Cervus canadensis), 42 cougars (Puma concolor), and 16 wolves (Canis lupus) to examine how elk habitat selection changed in relation to carnivores and humans in northeastern Washington, USA. Using step selection functions, we evaluated elk habitat use in relation to cougars, wolves, and humans, diel period (daytime vs. nighttime), season (summer calving season vs. fall hunting season), and habitat structure (open vs. closed habitat). The diel cycle was critical to understanding elk movement, allowing elk to reduce encounters with predators where and when they would be the largest threat. Elk strongly avoided cougars at night but had a near‐neutral response to cougars during the day, whereas elk avoided wolves at all times of day. Elk generally used more open habitats where cougars and wolves were most active, rather than altering the use of habitat structure depending on the predator species. Elk avoided humans during the day and ~80% of adult female mortality was human caused, suggesting that humans functioned as a "super predator" in this system. Simultaneously, elk leveraged the human shield against wolves but not cougars at night, and no elk were confirmed to have been killed by wolves. Our results add to the mounting evidence that humans profoundly affect predator–prey interactions, highlighting the importance of studying these dynamics in anthropogenic areas.

Evidence for optimal behavior of predators from parallel field investigations in two distinct wolf-prey systems

Eat or be eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator-savvy and predator-naive deer populations

Same place, different time, head up: Multiple antipredator responses to a recolonizing apex predator

A phenology of fear: Investigating scale and seasonality in predator-prey games between wolves and white-tailed deer

Cougars, wolves, and humans drive a dynamic landscape of fear for elk

Predator–prey space use and landscape features influence movement behaviors in a large‐mammal community

Proactive cursorial and ambush predation risk avoidance in four African herbivore species

Advances in biologging can identify nuanced energetic costs and gains in predators

Foraging rates from metabarcoding: Predators have reduced functional responses in wild, diverse prey communities

Scale-dependent home range optimality for a solitary omnivore.

Interactions between carnivore species: limited spatiotemporal partitioning between apex predator and smaller carnivores in a Mediterranean protected area

Friends because of foes: synchronous movement within predator-prey domains

Navigating the Landscape of Fear

Movement-integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk-reward trade-off

Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear

Human avoidance, selection for darkness and prey activity explain wolf diel activity in a highly cultivated landscape

Evidence for a survival-driven traveling wave in a keystone boreal predator population

Mesopredators have differing influences on prey habitat use and diel activity in a multipredator landscape

Do recolonising wolves trigger non‐consumptive effects in European ecosystems? A review of evidence

Adaptive responses to habitat change: Theory and tests with field experiments

Not afraid of the big bad wolf: calls from large predators do not silence mesopredators