Abstract:Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent type of adult leukemia. In many countries, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) remains the standard of care for frontline treatment of patients without high-risk cytogenetics. Although in most patients the disease responds initially, CIT can be associated with early and late toxicity and limited progression-free survival (PFS), requiring subsequent treatment. Novel chemotherapy-free targeted agents are highly effective but need to be taken continuously, which is associated with development of resistance clones and considerable medical and financial toxicities. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate potentially less toxic frontline chemotherapy-free regimens that could improve outcomes with a fixed duration of treatment. Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, potent, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), which has shown promising efficacy and safety in CLL. In a phase 1/2 trial of 99 patients with untreated CLL, the overall response rate (ORR) was 99% after a median time on study of 33 (1-39) months (Byrd et al.Blood 2018;132:692). Recently completed phase 3 trials showed acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab (obi) improved PFS vs chemotherapy in untreated patients (ELEVATE TN: AstraZeneca Press release 06/06/2019), and acalabrutinib improved PFS vs idelalisib or bendamustine + rituximab in relapsed/refractory patients (ASCEND: Ghia et al. EHA 2019;273259:LB2606). Combining a BTKi with an anti-CD20 antibody (obi) and a BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax [ven]) has the potential to achieve deeper responses and enhance rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD). In the phase 3 CLL-14 trial in untreated patients with CLL, fixed duration treatment with obi (6 months) + ven (12 months) was more efficacious than obi (6 months) + chlorambucil (12 months), achieving a longer PFS and higher rate of uMRD (Fischer et al. NEJM 2019;380:2225-36). Study design and methods: ACE-CL-311 (NCT03836261) is a 3-arm phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), global, multicenter, open-label trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib + ven (Arm A) vs acalabrutinib + ven + obi (Arm B) vs CIT (Arm C: fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab [FCR; only for patients ≤ 65 years of age] or bendamustine/rituximab [BR]). The trial opened in February 2019 and is recruiting adult patients with untreated CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutation. The enrollment target is 780 patients across about 250 sites. Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2 and fulfill iwCLL 2018 criteria for CLL diagnosis and treatment (Hallek et al. Blood 2018;131:2745-60). Adequate organ function requirements include serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase ≤2.5× upper limit of normal (ULN); total bilirubin ≤2× ULN; and estimated creatinine clearance of ≥50 mL/min (≥70 mL/min for FCR). Key exclusion criteria include stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, significant cardiovascular disease (asymptomatic or controlled atrial fibrillation allowed), bleeding disorders, or a requirement for treatment with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists or a strong cytochrome P450 inhibitor. Patients will be randomized to receive oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles for up to 14 cycles + once-daily oral ven (cycles 3-14; ramp-up followed by 400 mg/day) ± infusions of obi (cycles 2-7), or up to 6 cycles of FCR or BR. Patients will be evaluated for efficacy per iwCLL 2018 guidelines and observed until progressive disease, with survival followed post-progression. The primary efficacy endpoint is independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS in Arm A vs Arm C. Secondary efficacy endpoints include IRC- and investigator-assessed PFS, uMRD rates, ORR, event-free survival, duration of response, time-to-next therapy, and overall survival. Safety objectives include incidence and severity of adverse events. Exploratory efficacy endpoints include patient-reported outcomes. The study is powered to achieve ~90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.65 in PFS comparing Arm A to Arm C, assuming median PFS of 44.7 months in FCR/BR at the 2-sided significance level of 0.05. Patients will be stratified based on age (>65 vs ≤65 years), IGHV mutational status (mutated vs unmutated), Rai stage risk (high [≥3] vs non-high [<3]), and geographic location (North America vs Europe vs Other). Disclosures Brown: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Investys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Catapult Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Dynamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Eichhorst:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ArQule: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Research Funding. Ghia:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dynamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kater:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Khurana:Acerta Pharma: Employment. Elhamy:Acerta Pharma: Employment. Wang:Acerta Pharma: Employment; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership. Seymour:Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Yes, this is phase 3 trial for an indication (CLL) that is currently unapproved

Abstract:Introduction: Acalabrutinib is an irreversible BTK inhibitor (BTKi) in the treatment of relapsed patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We and others have previously reported that ibrutinib resistant MCL have poor outcomes and BTK mutations are uncommon in ibrutinib resistant MCL. However, the outcomes, causes of discontinuation, management and mutational landscape in MCL pts who discontinued acalabrutinib are not described. Methods: We reviewed charts from all relapsed MCL pts treated with acalabrutinib (n=26) in the relapsed setting and identified 21 pts who discontinued acalabrutinib, described in this analysis. Outcomes and management of patients after discontinuing acalabrutinib are reported. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) with SureSelect Human All Exon V6 was performed in 9 pts who progressed on acalabrutinib (10 tumor specimens and 5 matched germline samples); among these pts, 4 tumors were collected before acalabrutinib and 6 were collected after progression on acalabrutinib. One patient had paired sample at both time points (baseline and progression). Results: Among the 21 pts who discontinued acalabrutinib, 15 (71%) discontinued due to disease progression (2 pts transformed from classic to pleomorphic MCL at progression) and 6 discontinued due to intolerance (one for fatigue and idiopathic encephalopathy, one due to unrelated severe aortic stenosis, 2 others due to therapy related myelodysplasia and 2 due to cardiac issues). Two pts with cardiac issues had pre-existing coronary artery disease and one of them developed new onset atrial fibrillation. Overall, the median number of prior treatments was 2 (range, 1-3); all had prior chemo-immunotherapy and none with ibrutinib. The median duration on treatment with acalabrutinib was 8.3 months (1 to 50 months) and the median number of cycles of acalabrutinib treatment was 8 (range, 1-53). Thirteen pts had complete remission (CR) as their best response on acalabrutinib, 5 were primary refractory and 3 achieved partial remission. At the time of starting acalabrutinib, 12 pts had classic and 9 pts had blastoid (n=6) or pleomorphic (n=3) features, the median Ki-67 expression was 50% (range, 10-100). Pts who progressed, received acalabrutinib for a median duration of 8.3 months (range, 1-50) while those with intolerance, received acalabrutinib for a median duration of 9.4 months (range, 4-31). Median follow up after discontinuation was 38 months and the median post acalabrutinib survival was 24 months (not reached for progression and 7.4 months for intolerance; p =0.02, Figure-1A-B). Patients who discontinued due to intolerance could not get subsequent treatment for MCL. Among the 15 pts who progressed on acalabrutinib, 14 pts received systemic therapies for MCL [eight received ibrutinib based therapies (4 non responders, 3 achieved CR and 1 were PR and all pts progressed subsequently), 5 got chemo-immunotherapy, bortezomib, lenalidomide and progressed and one pt did not receive any treatment and was lost to follow up and died. Among the 15 pts who progressed on acalabrutinib, 6 patients who received anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy had significantly longer survival compared to those who did not get CART therapy; p = 0.007, Figure-1C. For all pts, at the time of last follow up, 10 pts were alive and in remission under follow up while 11 were dead. Recurrently mutated genes in these tumors included ATM (6/10; 60%), TP53 (4/10; 40%), KMT2C (3/10), MYCN (2/10), NOTCH1 (2/10), NOTCH3 (2/10), and MEF2B (2/10) (1-D). We did not detect any mutation or copy number alterations in BTK, PLCG2, TRAF2/3 and MYD88 that have been reported previously to be associated with ibrutinib resistance. To investigate the mutation evolution on acalabrutinib treatment, mutation profiles, particularly the mutation variant allelic fractions (VAFs), were compared between the baseline and progression samples from one patient. Mutation of MYCN, MEF2B, ATM, and NOTCH1 were identified in both tumors at similar VAFs, whereas mutation of CARD11 (two mutations), NLRC5 and B2M were detected only at progression. Conclusions: Relapsed MCL pts who fail acalabrutinib have poor outcomes. Advent of CART therapy has significantly improved survival of these heavily refractory pts. In this small cohort, we did not observe BTK mutations associated with acalabrutinib resistance in MCL pts. Further studies are ongoing to determine acalabrutinib resistance mechanism in MCL. Disclosures Lee: Takeda: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics: Research Funding; Guidepoint Blogal: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Westin:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; 47: Research Funding. Nastoupil:LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria; Gamida Cell: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vega:NCI: Research Funding. Flowers:Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding. Wang:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Nobel Insights: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Verastem: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Lu Daopei Medical Group: Honoraria; InnoCare: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Pulse Biosciences: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; OMI: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses.

Acalabrutinib alone or in combination with rituximab for follicular lymphoma: An open‐label study

Acalabrutinib in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: Results of the phase 1b open‐label study (ACE‐LY‐003)

Orelabrutinib, a New‐generation Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Relapsed/refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial

Acrue: A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of Acalabrutinib in Combination with Rituximab in Elderly and/or Frail Patients with Treatment-Naive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Combination of acalabrutinib with lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-arm phase II trial

Zanubrutinib Monotherapy in Relapsed/refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: a Pooled Analysis of Two Clinical Trials

Acalabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Primary analysis from an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial

Acalabrutinib-based regimens in frontline or relapsed/refractory higher-risk CLL: Pooled analysis of 5 clinical trials

Acalabrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma: 2-year safety and efficacy analysis

Phase 1/2 multicenter trial of acalabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Acalabrutinib with Rituximab As First-Line Therapy for Older Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma - a Phase II Clinical Trial

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and adverse effects of acalabrutinib in the management of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A Phase 3 Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib in Combination with Venetoclax with or without Obinutuzumab, Compared with Investigator's Choice of Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) without Del(17p) or TP53 Mutation

Pooled analysis of safety data from clinical trials evaluating acalabrutinib monotherapy in mature B-cell malignancies

ACCEPT - combining acalabrutinib with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): study protocol for a Phase Ib/II open-label non-randomised clinical trial

Safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide in previously untreated follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: An open label, phase 2 study

Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis

Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib and obinutuzumab in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a Japanese phase 1 study

Outcomes of Acalabrutinib Failures in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A Window Study of Acalabrutinib Plus Rituximab Followed By R-Dhaox (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, oxaliplatin) and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in Fit Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): The Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group (ALLG) NHL33 Wamm Trial