Phase I Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Acalabrutinib, Venetoclax, and Obinutuzumab (AVO) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Austin I Kim,Philippe Armand,Robert A. Redd,Megan Forsyth,Paul Branch,Samantha Pazienza,Lisa Brennan,Victoria Patterson,Susan M Waisgerber,Reid W. Merryman,David C Fisher,Christine E. Ryan,Inhye E Ahn,Jennifer L Crombie,Oreofe O. Odejide,Ann LaCasce,Caron A Jacobson,Eric Jacobsen,Erin M Parry,Matthew S Davids,Jennifer R. Brown,Arnold S. Freedman,Peter A. Riedell,Mark Alan Murakami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-173103
IF: 20.3
2023-11-28
Blood
Abstract:Introduction: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), even when treated with novel targeted agents, generally have only limited benefit (Rule et al., Leukemia 2018). The triple combination of the first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), ibrutinib, the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, obinutuzumab has demonstrated preliminary safety and efficacy in R/R and treatment naïve (TN) MCL (Le Gouill et al., Blood 2021). We therefore hypothesized that given the favorable toxicity profile of the second-generation BTKi, acalabrutinib, when given in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab (AVO), would be effective and well tolerated in both R/R and TN MCL. Here, we report the results of the phase I dose-finding cohort of AVO in patients with R/R MCL. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, multi-cohort phase I/II trial (NCT04855695). The primary endpoints of the phase I portion are the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and the safety and tolerability of AVO in R/R MCL. The study was designed to evaluate up to 2 dose levels of acalabrutinib, starting with the FDA-approved dose (100 mg po bid, dose level 0 [DL0]) followed by a lower dose (100 mg po daily, DL-1) if dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in > 1/6 patients in DL0 during the first 4 cycles. Patients were treated in 28-day cycles with acalabrutinib starting with cycle 1, followed by obinutuzumab in cycle 2 (100 mg IV on day 1, 900 mg IV on day 2, 1000 mg IV on days 8 and 15, and on day 1 of cycles 3-7), and venetoclax (weekly dose ramp-up starting in cycle 3 to a target dose of 400 mg daily). Acalabrutinib and venetoclax were continued indefinitely and obinutuzumab maintenance was given every 2 cycles starting with cycle 9 for 12 doses. Patients with progressive disease (PD) or who were unable to receive > 80% of the doses of acalabrutinib and venetoclax during the first 4 cycles were replaced. Key eligibility criteria included R/R MCL after at least one anti-CD20 mAb-based therapy, ECOG PS ≤ 2, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Key exclusion criteria were progression or relapse following prior BTKi or BCL-2 inhibitor and CNS involvement. CTCAE v5 and Lugano criteria were used to evaluate toxicity and efficacy, respectively. Results: As of July 26, 2023, 9 patients in DL0 were evaluable for response as 3 patients were replaced prior to reaching the DLT window. The median age was 67 (range 63-79). 78% were male. Median number of prior treatments was 1 (range 1-2). 33% relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant and 22% had primary refractory disease. All patients had advanced stage MCL, with stage IV disease in 89%. MIPI score was 22% high, 56% intermediate, and 22% low risk. Ki67 index ≥ 30% in 44% and ≥ 50% in 33%. 33% patients had complex karyotype, 22% TP53 mutation, 33% p53 IHC expression > 50%, and 33% blastoid variant. No DLTs were observed and DL0 was determined to be the RP2D. All 9 patients were evaluable for toxicity (Figure 1A). Hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (67%; 33% Gr 3), thrombocytopenia (56%; 22% Gr 3/4), and anemia (22%; all Gr 3). The most common toxicities were headache (77%; all Gr 1/2), bruising (67%; all Gr 1), diarrhea (44%; all Gr 1/2), and upper respiratory infection (22%; 11% Gr 3). There were no serious adverse events. There was no occurrence of febrile neutropenia, atrial fibrillation, bleeding, or laboratory or clinical tumor lysis syndrome. Median follow-up was 6 months (range 1-21). ORR was 78% (7/9) and CR rate was 67% (6/9) after 3 cycles of AVO. Both patients with TP53 mutation and 2/3 patients with blastoid variant achieved CR. Of the 3 patients replaced prior to the DLT window, 2 patients had PD and 1 patient was unable to receive > 80% of the acalabrutinib and venetoclax doses due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia, although achieved CR. 5 patients (56%) remain on treatment and in CR. 1 patient achieved PR after cycle 3 but progressed after cycle 7. Median overall and progression-free survival were not reached. Conclusions: AVO is safe and feasible in patients with R/R MCL with no DLTs observed. RP2D was determined at the full FDA approved dosage of all three drugs. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging in this high-risk R/R MCL population. The phase II TN transplant ineligible or TP53 mutated MCL cohort is now enrolling with minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided time-limited therapy (Figure 1B). The phase I R/R expansion cohort will also open to enrollment.
hematology