A comparison of prognoses between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and esophagogastric varices

Cheng-Yi Wei,Gar-Yang Chau,Ping-Hsien Chen,Chien-An Liu,Yi-Hsiang Huang,Teh-Ia Huo,Ming-Chih Hou,Han-Chieh Lin,Yu-Hui Su,Jaw-Ching Wu,Chien-Wei Su
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74424-y
IF: 4.6
2020-10-14
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Abstract There has been insufficient investigation of the differences in long-term outcomes between surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and esophagogastric varices (EGV). We retrospectively enrolled 251 patients with treatment-naïve HCC and EGV who underwent SR or RFA as a first-line treatment. Prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 68 patients underwent SR, and the remaining 183 patients received RFA. Patients who underwent SR were younger, had better liver functional reserves, and had larger tumors. After a median follow-up duration of 45.1 months, 151 patients died. The cumulative 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly higher among patients who underwent SR than those treated with RFA (66.7% vs. 36.8%, p 65 years, multiple tumors, RFA, albumin bilirubin grade > 1, and the occurrence of major peri-procedural morbidity were the independent risk factors that are predictive of poor OS. In conclusion, SR could be recommended as a first-line treatment modality for HCC patients with EGV if the patients are carefully selected and liver function is well preserved.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?