Survival of Patients Receiving Radiofrequency Ablation or Ethanol Injection for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Zhong-Zhe Lin,Wen-Yi Shau,Yu Yun Shao,Yi-Chun Yeh,Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo,Chiun Hsu,Chih-Hung Hsu,Ann-Lii Cheng,Mei-Shu Lai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15043
IF: 45.3
2013-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e15043 Background: Randomized trials suggest that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be more effective than percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the survival advantage of RFA need confirmation in daily practice. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance claim database and National Death Registry data from 2004 through 2009. Patients receiving PEI or RFA as first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed stage I-II HCC were enrolled. Results: A total of 658 patients receiving RFA and 378 patients receiving PEI treatment were included for final analysis. The overall survival (OS) rates of patients in the RFA and PEI groups at 5-year were 55% and 42%, respectively (p< 0.01). Compared to patients that received PEI, those that received RFA had lower risks of overall mortality and first-line treatment failure (FTF), with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (C.I.)] of 0.60 (0.50-0.73) for OS and 0.54 (0.46-0.64) for FTF. The favorable outcomes for the RFA group were consistently significant for patients with tumors > 2 cm as well as for those with tumors < 2 cm. Consistent results were also observed in other subgroup analyses defined by gender, age, tumor stage, and co-morbidity status. Conclusions: RFA provides better survival benefits than PEI for patients with unresectable stage I-II HCC, irrespective of tumors > 2 cm or ≤ 2 cm, in contemporary clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?