1733 An itemised discharge letter format improves clarity of information - a quality improvement project

J Macaulay,H Wear
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad246.012
2024-01-01
Age and Ageing
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Commonly, discharge letters employ a chronological “narrative” style (NS). These unstructured letters often do not clearly communicate rationale for diagnoses and management – a problem exacerbated in letters compiled by multiple staff. This project trialled an alternative format. Methods An itemised letter (IL) was designed, each diagnosis a separate numbered point; guidance was provided for relevant investigations and management to include for core geriatric conditions. Four “Plan Do Study Act” (PDSA) cycles were completed. Mixed-methods feedback informed subsequent cycles. PDSA cycle 1 piloted the IL. Responding to concerns ILs took longer, cycle 2 measured writing times on a second ward. Cycle 3 monitored spontaneous IL uptake and feedback throughout geriatric medicine, continued in Cycle 4 after 12 months when the department formally adopted ILs. Results We collected 17 email responses, 9 semi-structured interviews, 1 tweet, writing times, and uptake statistics. Framework analysis synthesised qualitative and quantitative results. The key finding was that ILs improved information clarity. The standardised structure made it easier to update letters, and teach letter writing to new staff. Some staff reported challenges changing letter format, and noted electronic templates were not optimised for ILs. Mean completion times were 23 minutes for IL (range 6.5–38, N=15) and 20 minutes for NS (15–26, N=5). Sample size imbalance reflected exclusion of letters, predominantly NS, started on other wards. Uptake data evidenced continued IL use despite staff rotations. When cycle 4 commenced a mean of 35% (range 0–91%) of letters were in IL, increasing after seven months to 64% (40.6–90%). Qualitative feedback mirrored on-going usage, with many doctors continuing IL use after rotation. PDSA cycle 5 has begun, discussing using ILs in other specialties. Conclusions The IL format was well received by hospital staff, and will be improved by feedback from GPs, relatives, and patients.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?