Implementing a Letter Template to Expedite Specialty Medication Appeal Letter Submission

Jessica Fann,Miranda Kozlicki,Kristen Whelchel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102262
2024-10-05
Abstract:Background: Prior authorizations (PAs) for biologic medications, used to treat Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), are often denied by Pharmacy Benefits Managers and can require a complex appeal process for patients to gain access to medication. Objective: This quality improvement project evaluated the impact of implementing a standardized appeal letter template and customizable clinical rationale letter content on specialty pharmacist workflow and workload in an integrated Hospital Health System Specialty Pharmacy (HSSP) IBD clinic. Practice description: This initiative was conducted in an IBD outpatient clinic at a tertiary academic medical center with an integrated HSSP whose specialty pharmacists work collaboratively with providers to manage specialty medications. Practice innovation: A letter template was created in the electronic health record (EHR) for pharmacists to use when submitting appeal letters. The template automatically populates patient results from recent labs, imaging, and clinic visit notes as part of the appeal documentation. Clinical rationale letter content was developed for the most common appeal reasons using EHR functionality that allows the creation of standardized notes that can be shared among team members and customized at time of use. Evaluation method: An analysis of 2 months of data pre/post implementation was conducted using descriptive statistics to report the number of appeals submitted, time from PA denial to appeal submission, and appeal approval rate. A pharmacist post implementation satisfaction score was also collected. Results: The number of appeals submitted pre- (n=73) and post-implementation (n=73) was the same. Post-implementation, 89% of appeals were submitted within 3 days of PA denial compared to 29% pre-implementation. PA approval rate was high (93%) pre- and post-implementation. Overall pharmacist satisfaction was 9.7 out of 10. Conclusion: Implementation of an appeal letter template and standardized clinical rationale letter content in the EHR led to decreased time to appeal submission and high specialty pharmacist satisfaction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?