Virtual reality in midwifery education: A mixed methods study to assess learning and understanding
Grace Ryan,Shauna Callaghan,Anthony Rafferty,John Murphy,Mary Higgins,Theresa Barry,Eleni Mangina,Lorraine Carroll,Fionnuala McAuliffe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105573
Abstract:Background: Virtual reality learning environments (VRLEs) are a potentially valuable learning tool that have recently increased in popularity due to widespread availability and decreased cost. VRLEs can provide an immersive learning environment that increases the understanding of three-dimensional relationships between anatomical structures. However, there is a paucity of evidence in the literature supporting its use within Midwifery education. Objectives: To explore the effectiveness of a VRLE as an educational tool in midwifery education. Setting: A large University in Ireland, with institutional ethical approval. Participants: Undergraduate and graduate degree midwifery students. Design: A descriptive qualitative and quantitative study was carried out. Data collection was carried out between September 2020 and March 2021. Methods: Participants underwent a VRLE lesson based on the topic of fetal lie, position, and presentation in pregnancy. A multiple-choice questionnaire was used to quantitatively evaluate knowledge before and immediately after the intervention, and knowledge retention after one week. Qualitative data was collected using open-ended questions in the questionnaire. The primary outcome was a difference in pre- and post-intervention knowledge scores. Data was analysed using repeated measures one-way ANOVA. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis and simple content analysis. All students participated in the quantitative and qualitative components of the study. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction and self-confidence in learning which were analysed using thematic analysis. The side effect profile of the virtual reality device was also explored using open-ended questions in the questionnaire. Results: Forty-one midwifery students participated in the study, with a 100 % participation and response rate. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences in knowledge scores pre- and post-intervention. Participants rated high satisfaction and self-confidence scores with regard to the VRLE as a learning modality. Side effects most commonly experienced by participants included dizziness (49 %), disorientation (30 %) and symptoms similar to motion sickness (32 %). The following themes were identified: "Learning in 3D", "The Power of Visual Learning", "The value of Educational Technology", "Learning can be fun and enjoyable". Conclusions: This study showed that the VRLE had no impact on knowledge gain, though high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence indicate a positive response to the VRLE. VRLEs are a potentially valuable learning tool to help enhance the student learning experience, promoting increased engagement, satisfaction, and self-confidence with the learning material.