Abstract:Blinded randomized controlled trials (RCT) require participants to be uncertain if they are receiving a treatment or placebo. Although uncertainty is ideal for isolating the treatment effect from all other potential effects, it is poorly suited for estimating the treatment effect under actual conditions of intended use-when individuals are certain that they are receiving a treatment. We propose an experimental design, randomization to randomization probabilities (R2R), which significantly improves estimates of treatment effects under actual conditions of use by manipulating participant expectations about receiving treatment. In the R2R design, participants are first randomized to a value, π, denoting their probability of receiving treatment (vs. placebo). Subjects are then told their value of π and randomized to either treatment or placebo with probabilities π and 1-π, respectively. Analysis of the treatment effect includes statistical controls for π (necessary for causal inference) and typically a π-by-treatment interaction. Random assignment of subjects to π and disclosure of its value to subjects manipulates subject expectations about receiving the treatment without deception. This method offers a better treatment effect estimate under actual conditions of use than does a conventional RCT. Design properties, guidelines for power analyses, and limitations of the approach are discussed. We illustrate the design by implementing an RCT of caffeine effects on mood and vigilance and show that some of the actual effects of caffeine differ by the expectation that one is receiving the active drug. (PsycINFO Database Record

Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

Estimating causal effects of treatments in experimental and observational studies

Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies

Statistical Inference For Causal Effects, With Emphasis On Applications In Epidemiology And Medical Statistics

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: the Role of Randomization

Comment: Estimating the Effects Caused by Treatments

Matching Algorithms for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments

Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

The Design Versus the Analysis of Observational Studies for Causal Effects: Parallels with the Design of Randomized Trials

Matched Sampling for Causal Effects

Estimating Causal Moderation Effects with Randomized Treatments and Non-Randomized Moderators

Conditional and Unconditional Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials: Estimands, Estimation, and Interpretation

Estimating treatment effect in randomized trial after control to treatment crossover using external controls

Disentangling Treatment and Placebo Effects in Randomized Experiments Using Principal Stratification-An Introduction

Randomization to Randomization Probability: Estimating Treatment Effects under Actual Conditions of Use.

For Objective Causal Inference, Design Trumps Analysis

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects

Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores

Matching with Multiple Control Groups with Adjustment for Group Differences

24 Statistical Inference for Causal Effects, with Emphasis on Applications in Psychometrics and Education