Abstract:For estimating causal effects of treatments, randomized experiments are generally considered the gold standard. Nevertheless, they are often infeasible to conduct for a variety of reasons, such as ethical concerns, excessive expense, or timeliness. Consequently, much of our knowledge of causal effects must come from non-randomized observational studies. This article will advocate the position that observational studies can and should be designed to approximate randomized experiments as closely as possible. In particular, observational studies should be designed using only background information to create subgroups of similar treated and control units, where 'similar' here refers to their distributions of background variables. Of great importance, this activity should be conducted without any access to any outcome data, thereby assuring the objectivity of the design. In many situations, this objective creation of subgroups of similar treated and control units, which are balanced with respect to covariates, can be accomplished using propensity score methods. The theoretical perspective underlying this position will be presented followed by a particular application in the context of the US tobacco litigation. This application uses propensity score methods to create subgroups of treated units (male current smokers) and control units (male never smokers) who are at least as similar with respect to their distributions of observed background characteristics as if they had been randomized. The collection of these subgroups then 'approximate' a randomized block experiment with respect to the observed covariates.

Estimating causal effects of treatments in experimental and observational studies

Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies

Statistical Inference For Causal Effects, With Emphasis On Applications In Epidemiology And Medical Statistics

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: the Role of Randomization

The Design Versus the Analysis of Observational Studies for Causal Effects: Parallels with the Design of Randomized Trials

Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

Matched Sampling for Causal Effects

Matching Algorithms for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments

Comment: Estimating the Effects Caused by Treatments

For Objective Causal Inference, Design Trumps Analysis

Distinguishing Between Mediators and Confounders is Important for the Causal Inference in Observational Studies

Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

Estimating Causal Moderation Effects with Randomized Treatments and Non-Randomized Moderators

Matching with Multiple Control Groups with Adjustment for Group Differences

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

Conditional and Unconditional Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials: Estimands, Estimation, and Interpretation

Estimating treatment effect in randomized trial after control to treatment crossover using external controls

Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects

The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects of Binary Treatments in Unconfounded Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes

Disentangling Treatment and Placebo Effects in Randomized Experiments Using Principal Stratification-An Introduction