Ensartinib vs Crizotinib for Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase−Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Leora Horn,Ziping Wang,Gang Wu,Elena Poddubskaya,Tony Mok,Martin Reck,Heather Wakelee,Alberto A. Chiappori,Dae Ho Lee,Valeriy Breder,Sergey Orlov,Irfan Cicin,Ying Cheng,Yunpeng Liu,Yun Fan,Jennifer G. Whisenant,Yi Zhou,Vance Oertel,Kim Harrow,Chris Liang,Li Mao,Giovanni Selvaggi,Yi-Long Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3523
IF: 33.006
2021-11-01
JAMA Oncology
Abstract:This randomized clinical trial compares ensartinib with crizotinib among patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not received prior treatment with an ALK inhibitor.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The aim of this paper is to address the following issue: comparing the efficacy of ensartinib versus crizotinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not been treated with ALK inhibitors. Specifically: - The study design is a global, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial. - Participants are patients aged 18 years and older with advanced or recurrent (stage III unsuitable for multimodal treatment) or metastatic (stage IV) ALK-positive NSCLC who have not previously received ALK inhibitor treatment. - The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent review committee according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. - Secondary endpoints include systemic and intracranial response, time to central nervous system progression, and overall survival. The study results indicate that ensartinib is superior to crizotinib in controlling both systemic and intracranial disease and has a good safety profile. Therefore, ensartinib becomes a new first-line treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.