Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients with Treatment-Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Update from the Phase III ALESIA Study

C. Zhou,Y. Lu,S-W. Kim,T. Baisamut (Reungwetwattana),J. Zhou,Y. Zhang,J. He,J. Yang,Y. Cheng,S-H. Lee,J. Chang,J. Fang,Z. Liu,L. Bu,L. Qian,T. Xu,V. Archer,M. Hilton,M. Zhou,L. Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100700
IF: 51.769
2022-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Introduction Previous results from the phase III ALESIA study (NCT02838420) demonstrated that alectinib (CNS-active, anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] inhibitor) had clinical benefit in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after ≥5 years of follow-up from “last patient in” date. Methods Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n=125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n=62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary/exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression, and safety. Results At data cut-off (May 16, 2022), median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median PFS was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.49). OS data remain immature; 5-year OS rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). ORR was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08–0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 months). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?