Abstract:In the collective-risk social dilemma, players lose their personal endowments if contributions to the common pool are too small. This fact alone, however, does not always deter selfish individuals from defecting. The temptations to free-ride on the prosocial efforts of others are strong because we are hardwired to maximize our own fitness regardless of the consequences this might have for the public good. Here we show that the addition of risky assets to the personal endowments, both of which are lost if the collective target is not reached, can contribute to solving the collective-risk social dilemma. In infinite well-mixed populations risky assets introduce new stable and unstable mixed steady states, whereby the stable mixed steady state converges to full cooperation as either the risk of collective failure or the amount of risky assets increases. Similarly, in finite well-mixed populations the introduction of risky assets enforces configurations where cooperative behavior thrives. In structured populations cooperation is promoted as well, but the distribution of assets amongst the groups is crucial. Surprisingly, we find that the completely rational allocation of assets only to the most successful groups is not optimal, and this regardless of whether the risk of collective failure is high or low. Instead, in low-risk situations bounded rational allocation of assets works best, while in high-risk situations the simplest uniform distribution of assets among all the groups is optimal. These results indicate that prosocial behavior depends sensitively on the potential losses individuals are likely to endure if they fail to cooperate.

Investment in the Common Good: Free Rider Effect and the Stability of Mixed Strategy Equilibria

Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game

Transition of Investment Strategies in the Security Market:A View of Evolution

Game of Variable Contributions to the Common Good under Uncertainty

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

The Disparate Equilibria of Algorithmic Decision Making when Individuals Invest Rationally

Randomly Biased Investments and the Evolution of Public Goods on Interdependent Networks

A Moderate Self-Interest Preference Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Particle swarm optimization with historical return decay enhances cooperation in public goods games with investment risks

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Dynamic Allocation of Investments Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games

Randomness and diversity matter in the maintenance of the public resources

Solving the collective-risk social dilemma with risky assets in well-mixed and structured populations

Unchecked strategy diversification and collapse in continuous voluntary public good games

Heterogeneous investment promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game on hypergraphs

Conditional Investment Strategy in Evolutionary Trust Games with Repeated Group Interactions

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

A Free and Fair Economy: A Game of Justice and Inclusion

Time-dependent effects hinder cooperation on the public goods game

Building Cooperation Through Gradualism in Finitely Repeated Investment Games