Abstract:Destructive agents, who opt out of the game and indiscriminately harm others, paradoxically foster cooperation, representing an intriguing variant of the voluntary participation strategy. Yet, their impact on cooperation remains inadequately understood, particularly in the context of pairwise social dilemma games and in comparison to their counterparts, constructive agents, who opt out of the game but indiscriminately benefit others. Furthermore, little is known about the combined effects of both agent types on cooperation dynamics. Using replicator dynamics in infinite and well-mixed populations, we find that contrary to their role in facilitating cooperation in multiplayer games, destructive agents fail to encourage cooperation in pairwise social dilemmas. Instead, they replace defection in the prisoners' dilemma and stag-hunt games. Similarly, in the chicken game, they can destabilize or replace the mixed equilibrium of cooperation and defection, undermining cooperation in the harmony (trivial) game. Conversely, constructive agents, when their payoffs exceed their contributions to opponents, can exhibit effects similar to destructive agents. However, if their payoffs are lower, while they destabilize defection in prisoners' dilemma and stag-hunt games, they do not disrupt the cooperation equilibrium in harmony games and have a negligible impact on the coexistence of cooperation in chicken games. The combination of destructive and constructive agents does not facilitate cooperation, but instead generates complex evolutionary dynamics, including bistable, tristable, and quadstable states, with outcomes contingent on their relative payoffs and game types. These results, taken together, enhance our understanding of the impact of the voluntary participation mechanism on cooperation, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of its influence. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.034307 ©2024 American Physical Society

Noncooperative dynamics in election interference

Models of Strategic Decision-Making under Informational Control

Defending Elections against Malicious Spread of Misinformation

Controlling Elections through Social Influence

Cross-border political competition

When Pull Turns to Shove: A Continuous-Time Model for Opinion Dynamics

To Act or not to Act? Political competition in the presence of a threat

Temporal interaction and its role in the evolution of cooperation

Voter Participation Control in Online Polls

Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Election

Multifaceted online coordinated behavior in the 2020 US presidential election

Elections As a Conflict Processing Mechanism

On the dynamics of social conflicts: looking for the Black Swan

Dynamical reciprocity in interacting games: Numerical results and mechanism analysis

Stability of pairwise social dilemma games: Destructive agents, constructive agents, and their joint effects

Tale of two emergent games: Opinion dynamics in dynamical directed networks

Manipulating Elections by Changing Voter Perceptions

Opinion Dynamics with Conflicting Interests

On the Preservation of Cooperation in Two-Strategy Games with Nonlocal Interactions

On the Robustness of Democratic Electoral Processes to Computational Propaganda

Interaction Stochasticity May Hinder Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game