Estimating median overall survival of apalutamide compared to placebo in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) populations: Statistical extrapolations of the TITAN study.

Neeraj Agarwal,Anders Bjartell,Álvaro Juárez,Ronja Kerßenboom,Nolen Perualila,Peter Wigfield,Kim N. Chi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.223
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:223 Background: Apalutamide plus ADT (APA) demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared to placebo plus ADT (PBO) for patients with mHSPC in the TITAN study (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79; P < .0001). At the time of final analysis, the median OS was not reached in the APA arm or subgroups after a median follow up of 44 months. This work aimed to estimate OS medians for APA and PBO arms beyond the TITAN follow-up by fitting validated survival models. Methods: OS was predicted for the overall population treated with APA or PBO, with or without Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) crossover adjustment, and for the low and high-volume (LVD, HVD), HVD synchronous and HVD metachronous subgroups. General population mortality adjusted TITAN patient-level data was fitted to six parametric models (Weibull, exponential, log-normal, log-logistic, generalized gamma, and Gompertz) using the individual fits approach. Best fit was determined by statistical and visual fits, along with the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)/Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) ranking, according to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit 14. Results: Best fit extrapolation estimated median OS of 71.8 months for the overall mHSPC population treated with APA (Table), leading to an estimated median improvement of up to 32 months versus PBO. Median OS values predicted by the other five models ranged from 62.4 to 78.1 months. Across subgroups, best fit models estimated median OS of 113.7 months for APA in LVD and a consistent median OS of 52 months for HVD subgroups. Conclusions: While results of this extrapolation study should not be equated to those of a clinical trial, this analysis meets an evidence gap by predicting median OS in the APA arm of the TITAN study for the overall mHSPC population as well as for various subgroups of this heterogeneous population, strengthening the evidence supporting early treatment with APA across the broad mHSPC population. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?