Abstract:The quantification of human DNA extracts from forensic samples plays a key role in the forensic genetics process, ensuring maximum efficiency and avoiding repeated analyses, over-amplified samples, or unnecessary examinations. In our laboratory, we use the Quantifiler® Trio system to quantify DNA extracts from a wide range of samples extracted from traces (bloodstains, saliva, semen, tissues, etc.), including swabs from touched objects, which are very numerous in the forensic context. This method has been extensively used continuously for nine years, following an initial validation process, and is part of the ISO/IEC 17025 accredited method. In routine practice, based on the quantitative values determined from the extracts of each trace, we use a standard method or a low-copy-number method that involves repeating the amplification with the generation of a consensus genetic profile. Nowadays, when the quantification results are less than 0.003 ng/μL in the minimum extraction volume (40 μL), we do not proceed with the DNA extract analysis. By verifying the limits of the method, we make a conscious cost-benefit choice, in particular by using the least amount of DNA needed to obtain sufficiently robust genetic profiles appropriate for submission to the Italian DNA Forensic Database. In this work, we present a critical re-evaluation of this phase of the method, which is based on the use of standard curves obtained from the average values of the control DNA analysed in duplicate. Considering the various contributions to uncertainty that are difficult to measure, such as manual pipetting or analytical phases carried out by different operators, we have decided to thoroughly investigate the contribution of variability in the preparation of calibration curves to the final results. Thus, 757 samples from 20 independent experiments were re-evaluated using two different standards for the construction of curves, determining the quantitative differences between the two methods. The experiments also determined the parameters of the slope, Y-intercept, R2, and the values of the synthetic control probe to verify how these parameters can provide information on the final outcome of each analysis. The outcome of this revalidation demonstrated that it is preferable to use quantification ranges rather than exact quantitative limits before deciding how to analyse the extracts via PCR or forgoing the determination of profiles. Additionally, we present some preliminary data related to the analysis of samples that would not have been analysed based on the initial validation, from which genetic profiles were obtained after applying a concentration method to the extracts. Our goal is to improve the accredited analytical method, with a careful risk assessment as indicated by accreditation standards, ensuring that no source of evidence is lost in the reconstruction of a criminal event.

Looking into the Quantification of Forensic Samples with Real-Time PCR

Developmental validation of a multiplex qPCR assay for simultaneous quantification of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA

An Assessment of the Performance Limitations of the Integrated QuantifilerTM Trio-HRM Assay: A Forensic Tool Designed to Identify Mixtures at the Quantification Stage

An innovative approach for low input forensic DNA sample analysis using the GlobalFiler™ IQC PCR amplification Kit on the Magelia® platform

The Usefulness of qPCR Data for Sample Pre-Assessment and Interpretation of Genetic Typing Results

A Custom qPCR Assay to Simultaneously Quantify Human and Microbial DNA

Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection

Genomic Multicopy Loci Targeted by Current Forensic Quantitative PCR Assays

Isolation and genetic analysis of pure cells from forensic biological mixtures: The precision of a digital approach

PCR in Forensic Science: A Critical Review

Statistefix 4.0: A novel probabilistic software tool

Comparing endpoint and real-time PCR for forensic body fluid identification

A developmental validation of the Quick TargSeq 1.0 integrated system for automated DNA genotyping in forensic science for reference samples

Evaluation of microfluidics-based droplet PCR combined with multiplex STR system in forensic science

Quantitative PCR overestimation of DNA in samples contaminated with tin

Towards a smart PCR process

Forensic Validation and Application Evaluation of IDentifier DNA Typing Kit (Yan-Huang34)

Utilization of Digital PCR in Quantity Verification of Plasmid Standards Used in Quantitative PCR

A Proof-of-principle Study on Implementing Polymerase Chain Displacement Reaction (PCDR) to Improve Forensic Low-Template DNA Analysis.

Forensic Genetics as a Tool for Forensic Investigation at the Crime Scene

Multiple Reaction Monitoring Tandem Mass Spectrometry Approach for the Identification of Biological Fluids at Crime Scene Investigations