Individual participant data meta-analysis to compare EPDS accuracy to detect major depression with and without the self-harm item
Xia Qiu,Yin Wu,Ying Sun,Brooke Levis,Jizhou Tian,Jill T Boruff,Pim Cuijpers,John P A Ioannidis,Sarah Markham,Roy C Ziegelstein,Simone N Vigod,Andrea Benedetti,Brett D Thombs,DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) EPDS Group,Chen He,Ankur Krishnan,Parash Mani Bhandari,Dipika Neupane,Zelalem Negeri,Mahrukh Imran,Danielle B Rice,Marleine Azar,Matthew J Chiovitti,Simon Gilbody,Lorie A Kloda,Scott B Patten,Nicholas D Mitchell,Rubén Alvarado,Jacqueline Barnes,Cheryl Tatano Beck,Carola Bindt,Humberto Correa,Tiago Castro E Couto,Genesis Chorwe-Sungani,Valsamma Eapen,Nicolas Favez,Ethel Felice,Gracia Fellmeth,Michelle Fernandes,Sally Field,Barbara Figueiredo,Jane R W Fisher,Eric P Green,Simone Honikman,Louise M Howard,Pirjo A Kettunen,Jane Kohlhoff,Zoltán Kozinszky,Angeliki A Leonardou,Michael Maes,Pablo Martínez,Sandra Nakić Radoš,Daisuke Nishi,Susan J Pawlby,Tamsen J Rochat,Heather J Rowe,Deborah J Sharp,Alkistis Skalkidou,Johanne Smith-Nielsen,Alan Stein,Kuan-Pin Su,Inger Sundström-Poromaa,Meri Tadinac,S Darius Tandon,Iva Tendais,Annamária Töreki,Thach D Tran,Kylee Trevillion,Katherine Turner,Mette S Væver,Thandi van Heyningen,Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier,Karen Wynter,Kimberly A Yonkers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29114-w
2023-03-10
Abstract:Item 10 of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is intended to assess thoughts of intentional self-harm but may also elicit concerns about accidental self-harm. It does not specifically address suicide ideation but, nonetheless, is sometimes used as an indicator of suicidality. The 9-item version of the EPDS (EPDS-9), which omits item 10, is sometimes used in research due to concern about positive endorsements of item 10 and necessary follow-up. We assessed the equivalence of total score correlations and screening accuracy to detect major depression using the EPDS-9 versus full EPDS among pregnant and postpartum women. We searched Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from database inception to October 3, 2018 for studies that administered the EPDS and conducted diagnostic classification for major depression based on a validated semi-structured or fully structured interview among women aged 18 or older during pregnancy or within 12 months of giving birth. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis. We calculated Pearson correlations with 95% prediction interval (PI) between EPDS-9 and full EPDS total scores using a random effects model. Bivariate random-effects models were fitted to assess screening accuracy. Equivalence tests were done by comparing the confidence intervals (CIs) around the pooled sensitivity and specificity differences to the equivalence margin of δ = 0.05. Individual participant data were obtained from 41 eligible studies (10,906 participants, 1407 major depression cases). The correlation between EPDS-9 and full EPDS scores was 0.998 (95% PI 0.991, 0.999). For sensitivity, the EPDS-9 and full EPDS were equivalent for cut-offs 7-12 (difference range - 0.02, 0.01) and the equivalence was indeterminate for cut-offs 13-15 (all differences - 0.04). For specificity, the EPDS-9 and full EPDS were equivalent for all cut-offs (difference range 0.00, 0.01). The EPDS-9 performs similarly to the full EPDS and can be used when there are concerns about the implications of administering EPDS item 10.Trial registration: The original IPDMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015024785).