Evolution of breast conserving surgery—current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review

Inés Torras,Isaac Cebrecos,Helena Castillo,Eduard Mension

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-454

2024-03-22

Gland Surgery

Abstract:Evolution of breast conserving surgery—current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review

surgery

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery

Eva Heeling,Annemiek K. E. van Hemert,Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-23-40

2023-10-01

Translational Breast Cancer Research

Abstract:A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery
Oncoplastic breast surgery: where are we now

Patricia Clark,Ashley DiPasquale,Daniela Cocco,Andrew Brown,Ashley Brown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27665

2024-12-06

European Journal of Cancer Prevention

Abstract:ABSTRACT In the 1970s, we learned breast conservation therapy (BCT) was not inferior to mastectomy. Early BCT methods could result in deformities that were unacceptable to patients and to their surgeons. By the 1990s, surgeons began to apply the principles of plastic surgery to improve outcomes. The term oncoplastic surgery was first described in the 1990s by Werner Audretsch. We offer a review of principles, techniques, current controversies, and challenges in broadening the utilization of OPS.

oncology
Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed

Lauren M Willcox,Albert Losken,Gabriela Del Pilar Garcia Nores

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-363

2024-05-30

Abstract:The surgical management of breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the last century and now includes oncoplastic techniques that improve both cosmetic and oncologic outcomes for patients. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with a broad overview of the history of oncoplastic breast surgery in the United States (USA), and to summarize important patient factors and technical innovations for optimal operative planning in the era of multimodal treatment of breast cancer. The indications for oncoplastic surgery (OPS) have broadened significantly as more women pursue breast conservation with preservation of their native breast tissue. The operative philosophy of OPS is based on fundamental reconstructive principles, with technique selection based largely on tumor size and location. Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy techniques have become some of the most utilized procedures in OPS due to their versatility to address tumors in almost all areas of the breast. Volume replacement techniques with locoregional perforator flaps continue to gain popularity as a single-stage reconstructive option for women with large tumor to breast ratios, especially with specialized plastic surgeons at high volume, academic centers. The oncologic advantages of OPS have allowed women to avoid mastectomy with improved margin control, re-excision rates, and equivalent overall survival all while preserving the aesthetic outcomes for these patients. Despite the proven benefits of OPS, numerous healthcare systems barriers including insurance status, geographic location, referral patterns, and racial disparities all continue to play a role in access to surgical sub-specialized breast oncology care demonstrating the need for ongoing research and education about oncoplastic principles.
Surgical techniques in breast cancer: an overview

Hirah Rizki,Jajini S. Varghese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2021.11.016

2022-02-01

Surgery (Oxford)

Abstract:With advancements in oncology and oncoplastic training, the options for treating breast cancer have expanded exponentially over the past two decades. In particular, surgical techniques have advanced to the point where oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes are now the pillars of contemporary breast surgery. Studies have demonstrated that by using oncoplastic techniques, breast conservation has become an alternative for many patients who would otherwise undergo mastectomy. Nonetheless, a considerable cohort of patients will still require, or request, a mastectomy. Surgical options range from a simple wide local excision, therapeutic mammoplasty or volume replacement techniques with a local flap, to mastectomy with whole breast reconstruction using autologous tissue or a prosthetic implant. Deciding between surgical options involves careful consideration of tumour characteristics, patient comorbidities and the potential effects of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments. The key message for surgeons is to ensure the chosen surgery does not compromise oncological outcomes and provides an excellent aesthetic outcome with timely healing to prevent delays in commencing adjuvant oncology treatments. In this article, we discuss techniques for breast conservation surgery and reconstructive options after mastectomy. In addition, we detail the safety and influence of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments on surgery.
Breast Cancer Surgery: New Issues

Francesca Magnoni,Sofia Alessandrini,Luca Alberti,Andrea Polizzi,Anna Rotili,Paolo Veronesi,Giovanni Corso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050344

2021-10-11

Current Oncology

Abstract:Since ancient times, breast cancer treatment has crucially relied on surgeons and clinicians making great efforts to find increasingly conservative approaches to cure the tumor. In the Halstedian era (mid-late 19th century), the predominant practice consisted of the radical and disfiguring removal of the breast, much to the detriment of women’s psycho-physical well-being. Thanks to enlightened scientists such as Professor Umberto Veronesi, breast cancer surgery has since impressively progressed and adopted a much more conservative approach. Over the last three decades, a better understanding of tumor biology and of its significant biomarkers has made the assessment of genetic and molecular profiles increasingly important. At the same time, neo-adjuvant treatments have been introduced, and great improvements in genetics, imaging technologies and in both oncological and reconstructive surgical techniques have been made. The future of breast cancer management must now rest on an ever more precise and targeted type of surgery that, through an increasingly multidisciplinary and personalized approach, can ensure oncological radicality while offering the best possible quality of life.

oncology
Oncoplastic resections for breast cancer: the effect of tumor localization and morphological features on the choice of surgical method: history of the issue (Literature review)

G. M. Zapirov,A. D. Zikiryahodzhaev,I. M. Onofriychuk,S. I. Mikhailov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/89/01

2024-07-27

Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery

Abstract:The development of surgical technology, advances in a chemotherapy and radiation therapy for the treatment of the breast cancer is a solution of not only medical, but also aesthetic problems. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of breast cancer has made it possible to use less aggressive tactics of surgical treatment, complementing the operation with other methods of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Despite the fact is a modern conditions the issue of rehabilitation and preservation of the quality of life of patients after surgical treatment is more acute than ever, today there are no collecting recommendations for the use of breast conserving treatment methods for breast cancer, it is can be useful to adequately assess the risk of tumor recurrence and it is advisable to determine the scope of surgical treatment. However, the experience accumulated by surgeons allows us to identify risk factors for tumor recurrence depending on the characteristics of its location and morphological structure of the tumor. Considering the possibilities of modern neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even with an unfavorable immunohistochemical type of tumor, we can offer patients the choice of breast conserving treatment. This issue is especially acute among young patients, the proportion of whom is increasing every year. In this connection, we can achieve faster treatment of breast cancer, as well as achieve a good aesthetic result with minimal surgical interventions, without the help of foreign materials (implants or other mesh).
Modified oncoplastic lift, lymphatic excision, and reconstruction: Introduction of a novel technique in oncoplastic breast surgery with simple surgical principles

Gabriel De la Cruz Ku,Anshumi Desai,Alexis R. Narvaez-Rojas,Caiwei Zheng,Amber Collier,Lee Weber,Wrood Kassira,Eli Avisar,Mecker G. Möller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2023.12.001

IF: 2.632

2024-01-01

The Surgeon

Abstract:Introduction Oncoplastic surgery is an important component of the management of breast cancer. As prognosis has improved, the need for proficient techniques to achieve disease eradication while maintaining cosmesis for naturally appearing breasts has gained importance. This study describes an easy-to-learn modified oncoplastic technique for patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment. Description of the technique Tumor resection is performed through different peri-areolar, inframammary, or radial incisions . To reduce the size of the surgical defect created after tissue resection, an internal purse-string is performed parallel to the chest wall or base of the wound with subsequent staggering in three or more layers as needed, while maintaining the parallel orientation of the needle. This is followed by the creation and overlapping of internal breast tissue flaps that are rearranged to decrease the dead space with the aim of improving cosmesis. The redundant skin is removed for the skin envelope to maintain shape. The wound is closed in layers. We also describe steps in performing sentinel lymph node and tumor extraction through the same periareolar, inframammary, or radial incisions for tumors located in outer quadrants. Following closure, contour and projection of the breast were maintained without indentation or loss of projection, with a symmetrical appearance to the contralateral side. Conclusion This simplified oncoplastic (MOLLER) technique can be easily learned and used by surgeons who treat cancer patients and have limited oncoplastic training. It uses basic known surgical principles to decrease the size of the defect created while minimizing the need for larger incisions/pedicles.

surgery
Current trends in breast cancer surgery

Z Chaloupková,O Coufal,L Gabrielová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2024247

Abstract:The incidence of breast cancer has been increasing significantly over the past decades, while the mortality rate has, actually, been decreasing. Behind this favorable trend in the decrease in mortality are not only high-quality screening programs, but also undoubtedly advances in therapy, especially new methods in surgical treatment. The importance of oncoplastic approach integrating resection and reconstruction procedures is obvious. Our efforts continue to maximize breast-conserving therapy, which is being improved in parallel with the development of new localization methods of non-palpable lesions. Breast-conserving therapy indication spectrum is also increasing with the use of oncoplastic approach allowing the resection of a significant part of the mammary gland while achieving an acceptable cosmetic result. We improve guidelines for skin-sparing procedures and also possibilities and availability of breast reconstruction. Most popular is breast reconstruction with free abdominal flap transfer. However, due to such demanding complex procedure with limited availability, there is also a significant development of silicone-implant-based reconstruction or methods of fat transfer. Constant attention is focused on axillary surgery, now especially in cases of initial nodal involvement that responds favorably to neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Current findings indicate tendency to modify and differentiate surgical indications according to the tumor phenotype. Complex lymphedema prevention surgery, such as lymphatic mapping or restoring lymphatic flow via microsurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis, can provide effective and long-term improvement and is challenging. Recently in the Czech Republic, we reopened the discussion about the optimal concentration of medical care in a smaller number of specialized breast centers, which we think is one of a number of steps on the constant path to improve medical results.
Oncoplasty in Breast Conservative Surgery

WANG Hui-yuan,LI Fei,LUO Bin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631x.2012.04.018

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate oncoplastic techniques on breast conservative surgery.Methods Clinical data of 50 breast cancer patients who received oncoplastic breast conservative surgery from October 2009 to August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.The indication,methods,outcome and morbility of oncoplastic surgery were assessed. Results All patients had solitary tumors.Twelve patients received neoadjuvant therapy and thirty-eight received upfront surgical therapy.Different oncoplastic surgery techniques were applied based on the location of tumor.There were 20 tumors located in upper outer quadrant receiving lateral radial or horizontal excision; Four lower inner and seven lower outer tumors received V and J shape excision respectively; Three low pole and seven upper pole tumors received inverted T and batwing excision respectively; Six tumors located periareolar area and three tumors located retroareolar area were removed using round block and J shape excision.Two patients experienced postoperative hematoma and three patients had incisional dehiscence followed by secondary infection. Another developed skin ischemia and necrosis. Thirty-five patients have finished the postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. The appearances of the breasts were satisfactory in all patients except one having deviation of nipple and two patients suffering from dimpling in incisional region.Patients gave high scores about their breast appearance.After 4- 27 months follow-up,two patients had local recurrence and received mastectomy.Other patients were free of recurrence. Conclusions Breast oncoplastic surgery technique benefits those whose tumors located in special area of the breast resulting in a satisfactory cosmetical appearance of the breast.
Improving quality of breast conservative surgery for lower quadrants cancer in small and medium sized breasts: Crescent technique versus J mammoplasty

Giuseppe Falco,Ljuba Morando,Giulia Borgonovo,Evelina Begnini,Saverio Coiro,Monica Foroni,Eugenio Cenini,Fabio Castagnetti,Simone Mele,Guglielmo Ferrari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-74

2024-09-03

Gland Surgery

Abstract:Keywords: Breast conservative surgery (BCS); oncoplastic; Crescent technique; J-mammoplasty technique; aesthetic outcome

surgery
Extreme oncoplasty: past, present and future

René Aloisio da Costa Vieira,Regis Resende Paulinelli,Idam de Oliveira-Junior

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1215284

IF: 4.7

2024-01-30

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Breast surgery has evolved from mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Breast oncoplastic surgery later emerged with the inclusion and development of techniques used in plastic surgery for breast neoplasms. Recently, a new paradigm has been considered for mastectomy candidates with large multifocal and multicentric tumours, designated extreme oncoplasty (EO), which has allowed new techniques to be applied to tumours that would have been ineligible for BCS before. There are few publications and no uniform descriptions grouping all the technical possibilities and new indications together. We performed this a review with the objective of evaluating the indications and surgeries performed in the EO context, representing a new perspective for BCS. We observed new indications as extensive microcalcifications, locally advanced breast carcinoma with partial response to chemotherapy, small to moderate-sized non-ptotic central tumours and extreme ptosis. Small breasts are able for EO since the presence of ptosis. New surgeries are reported as disguised geometric compensation, perforators flaps, local/regional flaps, latissimus dorsi miniflap and partial breast amputation. It is important to decrease barriers to oncoplastic surgery if we want to increase the use of EO and BCS rates.

oncology
The Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Immediate Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction With Contralateral Breast Adjustment

Ofir Sahar,Reut Har Zvi,Daphna Barsuk,Yoav Barnea,Or Gelbart Pridan,Keren Hod,Merav Akiva Ben-David

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae030

2024-03-19

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Abstract:Abstract Background Oncoplastic surgery is an expanding approach for managing breast conservation, as it offers improved cosmetic outcomes while maintaining oncological safety. Objectives This study aimed to assess the oncologic and surgical outcomes of patients who underwent oncoplastic procedures at our institution. Methods The study population includes all consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy followed by immediate oncoplastic breast reconstruction with contralateral breast adjustment between 2010 and 2021. Following IRB approval, we evaluated patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical details, complications, and follow-up for this group. Quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) were assessed through questionnaires. Results Following multidisciplinary tumor board discussion 77 patients (82 breasts) underwent oncoplastic surgery. 92.2% underwent breast MRI prior to surgery with mean mass enhancement of 2.35 cm (0-8.5) and non-mass enhancement of 5.77 cm [0-14 cm]), 44% presented with multifocal disease. The final positive surgical margin rate was 2.4%, and all conserved breasts received adjuvant radiation therapy. At 5 years, local recurrence rate was 4.1% for invasive tumors. QOL scores were generally high, with most patients reporting good-excellent cosmetic outcomes and high personal satisfaction with breast appearance and softness. Physicians reported breast symmetry in 89.5%. Conclusions The findings suggest that oncoplastic surgery with contralateral breast adjustment is safe, effective, and excellent option for breast cancer patients wishing for breast conservation even in large or multifocal masses, with favorable oncologic and cosmetic outcomes. The QOL analysis indicates high patient satisfaction. These results support the use of oncoplastic surgery in the management of breast cancer.

surgery
The impact of advanced oncoplastic surgery on breast-conserving surgery rates: A retrospective cohort study of 3,875 breast cancer procedures at a tertiary referral centre

Angus Reid,Robert Thomas,Andrew Pieri,Adam Critchley,Lorraine Kalra,Jane Carter,J M O'Donoghue,Emily King,Henry Cain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103814

Abstract:Introduction: As the treatment of breast cancer advances, the focus has shifted from solely improving oncological endpoints to a greater weight being placed on cosmetic and psychological outcomes. The advent of advanced oncoplastic techniques allows for successful breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to patients who otherwise would have required a mastectomy. The aim of this study is to ascertain if the adoption of these procedures has assisted in the reduction of mastectomies performed. Methods: A dataset of all breast cancer procedures based upon coding between April 2016 and July 2023 was evaluated, categorising procedures into: BCS, mastectomy, oncoplastic BCS and total reconstructions. R-Studio Software 4.3.1 (®) was used to explore statistical analysis and data visualisation. Registered as a clinical services evaluation study (Project ID: 14649). Results: During the period stated, 3875 index breast cancer procedures were recorded (sample size = 3638 patients). The BCS rate increased from 66.2 % in 2016 to 80.7 % in 2023. Using a linear regression model, the BCS rate demonstrates an increase of 2.1 % each year (coefficient = 2.12, p-value = 0.0069). Concurrently, the rate of oncoplastic BCS increased from 10.5 % to 22.9 % (coefficient = 2.14, p-value = 0.00017). Using Pearson's product-moment, a positive correlation between these two variables is seen (coefficient = 0.86, p-value = 0.0056). Conclusion: Having reviewed 3875 index breast cancer procedures over the past eight years, the BCS rate has shown a statistically significant increase and a positive correlation with the oncoplastic BCS rate. This suggests oncoplastic surgery has helped to reduce the rates of mastectomy at the centre.
Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review

Jesse Hu,Richard M Rainsbury,Ashvina Segaran,Oana Predescu,Pankaj G Roy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020859

IF: 3.006

2018-07-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Oncoplastic breast surgery allows the excision of larger tumours without compromising cosmetic outcome and can be broadly divided into volume displacement and volume replacement techniques. Although oncoplastic surgery has rapidly gained acceptance and is now widely practised, evidence is still lacking especially in patients who underwent volume replacement techniques. As it is a relatively new technique that has been described in the literature in the recent years, a summary of evidence from this literature can help clinicians to understand the clinical, oncologicalandcosmetic outcomes of such procedures. Methods and analysis All original studies including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case–control studies and case series involving more than 10 women undergoing partial breast reconstruction using a volume replacement technique will be included. The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. The secondary objective is to review the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) associated with oncoplastic breast surgery to help identify any unmet needs and to consider refining the existing PROMs to suit women undergoing volume replacement surgery. A comprehensive literature search, eligibility assessment and extraction of data will be conducted by two trained teams acting independently. Data will be extracted and stored in a database with standardised extraction fields to facilitate easy and consistent data entry. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Cochrane tests. Ethics and dissemination This systematic review requires no ethical approval. It will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it will also be presented at nationalandinternational conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017075700; Pre-results.

medicine, general & internal
Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis

Rui Tian,Yu Zheng,Ruikang Liu,Chen Jiang,Hongmei Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103784

2024-08-05

Abstract:Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The surgical treatment of breast cancer has transitioned progressively from radical mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery. In this meta-analysis, we are aiming to compare oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OS) with conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in terms of efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane databases, Clinicaltrial.gov, and CNKI until April 30, 2024. Data from cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Outcomes included primary outcomes (re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, mastectomy), secondary outcomes and safety outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate the quality of outcomes. Results: Our study included 52 studies containing 46,835 patients. Primary outcomes comprise re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, and mastectomy, there were significant differences favoring OS over BCS (RR 0.68 [0.56, 0.82], RR 0.62 [0.47, 0.82], RR 0.76 [0.59, 0.98], RR 0.66 [0.44, 0.98] respectively), indicating superior efficacy of OS. Additionally, OS demonstrated significant aesthetic benefits (RR 1.17 [1.03, 1.33] and RR 1.34 [1.18, 1.52]). While total complications were significantly fewer in the OS group (RR 0.70 [0.53, 0.94]), the differences in specific complications were not significant. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted based on nationality, sample size, quality, and type. Conclusion: OS demonstrates either superior or at least comparable outcomes across various aspects when compared to BCS.
Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery versus standard breast conserving surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer: a retrospective analysis from Sri Lanka

Kanchana Wijesinghe,Thilanka Abeywickrama,Yohan Chamara,Sumali De Silva,Sebastianpillai Tharshan,Umesh Jayarajah,Ajith De Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02182-5

2023-09-13

BMC Surgery

Abstract:Breast aesthetics is becoming increasingly important in breast cancer surgery due to changes in patient expectations and greater emphasis been placed on the psychosocial outcomes. Studies have shown no difference in local recurrence risk between mastectomy and breast conserving surgery (BCS) and also a higher overall survival rate after BCS. Breast preservation improves the quality of life substantially compared to mastectomy. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (O-BCS) involves tumour excision whilst overcoming the limitations of standard breast conserving surgery (S-BCS) by allowing larger resection volumes, avoiding deformities with better aesthetic results. Our study aims to compare the oncosurgical and aesthetic outcomes of O-BCS versus S-BCS among women in Sri Lanka.

surgery
Parallel pathways: A chronicle of evolution in rectal and breast cancer surgery

Antonio Pesce,Nicolò Fabbri,Diletta Iovino,Carlo Vittorio Feo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1091

2024-04-10

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

Abstract:In this editorial, we have analyzed the historical evolution of rectal and breast cancer surgery, focusing on the progressive reduction of demolitive approaches and the increasing use of more conservative strategies, accompanied by a growing emphasis on perioperative treatments aimed at enhancing surgical outcomes. All of these changes have been made possible due to an increased awareness and understanding of oncological diseases and improved perioperative treatments.

oncology,gastroenterology & hepatology
Comparative analysis of the degree of patient satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Fabiana Christina Araújo Pereira Lisboa,Lucimara Priscila Campos Veras Giorgi,Ana Claudia Morais Godoy Figueiredo,Régis Resende Paulinelli,João Batista de Sousa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1396432

2024-07-16

Abstract:Introduction: Conservative surgery is the gold standard for the treatment of single and small tumors and, combined with the concept of oncoplastic tumors, brings good aesthetic results while maintaining cancer safety. The objective was to comparatively analyze the degree of satisfaction of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS), with and without oncoplastic surgery (OPS) using level II OPS techniques. Methods: Review with a search in the databases MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE, Clinical Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, BVS and Oppen gray. The meta-analysis of random effects was performed using the Der Simonian-Laird method considering the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the aesthetic outcome between women who underwent OPS and BCS (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.62-1.30). The staging (OR 1.93; 95% CI 0.97-3.84; I 2 = 15.83%); tumor location [central (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.06-27.49; I 2 = 17.63%); lower (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.21-2.65; I 2 = 2.21%); superior (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.74; I 2 = 0.00%] and tumor size (OR 8.73; 95% CI -11.82-29.28; I 2 = 93.18%) showed no association with the type of BCS performed, with or without OPS. The degree of satisfaction remains even in cases of extreme oncoplasty. Conclusion: The level of patient satisfaction in relation to BCS was similar to that of the group undergoing OPS, highlighting that OPS allows the patient's satisfaction rate to be maintained even in the case of large or multicentric tumors.
Clinical analysis of oncoplastic surgical techniques applied in breast-conserving surgery of early stage breast cancer

Wen-yan WANG,Xin WANG,Yang WANG,Ji-dong GAO,Jing WANG,Li-xue XUAN,Yi FANG,Xiang WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2015.13.06.14

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the short-term clinical effect and cosmetic outcome of oncoplastic techniques applied in breast-conserving surgery. Method Clinical data of 25 breast cancer patients who received breast-conserv-ing surgery with gland tissue flap or latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap following breast reconstruction (observation group), and of another 25 patients that received traditional breast conservative surgery (control group) were retrospec-tively analyzed. The resection range, margin, RTOG cosmetic outcome evaluation, postoperative complications and re-currence or metastasis of the two groups were compared. Result Among the observation group, 21 cases received immediate breast reconstruction with adjacent gland tissue flap and 4 cases were with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. The resection volume of the breast in observation group ranged from 26 to 1105 cm3, with a median volume of 343 cm3, while that of the control group ranged from 15 to 504 cm3, with a median volume of 262 cm3. And there were 3 cases in observation group, and 5 cases in control group that had positive surgical margins confirmed by intra-operative pathologic test of the frozen sections, while no significant differences were observed (χ2=0.504, P=0.478). As for RTOG cosmetic outcome evaluation, number of patients with excellent or good results were 22 (88%) and 20 (80%) in the observation group and control group, respectively, and there were still no significant differences between the two groups (χ2=0.611, P=0.737). One patient in the observation group had multiple bone metastasis in 2 months after surgery, and no recurrence or death was observed after a median follow-up of 5 months (range 2-12 months). Conclusion Application of plastic breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer on the basis of negative surgical margins may bring about better cosmetic effect, with satisfactory short-term clinical outcome, making it an option that is worth further clinical practice.
[Past and present of endoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in treatment of breast diseases]

Qing Zhang,Yanyan Xie,Faqing Liang,Yu Feng,Zhenggui Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202404034

2024-07-15

Abstract:Objective: To review the research progress related to endoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for breast diseases, aiming to provide references for clinical practice. Methods: The recent domestic and international literature on endoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for breast diseases was reviewed, then the challenges in their development, the innovative evolution of endoscopic surgery combined with clinical practice by our team, and its clinical applications were summarized. Results: Traditional endoscopic surgery, despite its advantages such as minimal invasiveness, good cosmetic outcomes, and high patient's satisfaction, has been limited in its development due to specific difficulties in establishing the operative field. Our team innovatively proposed the "reverse sequence method" and the Huaxi Hole 1 theory and methods, cleverly altering the surgical procedure sequence, adding small operative orifices to transform single-port operations into multi-port ones, effectively overcoming the challenges restricting the advancement of endoscopic surgery in the field of breast diseases, thereby enabling further proliferation of endoscopic procedures. In terms of breast endoscopic reconstruction surgery, the parachute patch technique has broadened the indications for reconstruction surgery, benefiting patients with a certain degree of breast ptosis; and the postoperative adjustment concept, through early intervention in the post-reconstruction breast shape, has further refined the reconstruction procedure. Robot-assisted surgery derived from endoscopic surgery theory has further enhanced the precision and stability of surgeries, reducing surgical risks; however, excessive time and economic costs are urgent issues that must be addressed. Conclusion: Through theoretical innovations, endoscopic surgery has been applied in the excision and reconstruction of breast lesions, while robotic surgery shows promising applications in autologous breast reconstruction, especially in the latissimus dorsi reconstruction field. Nevertheless, the lack of high-level large-sample, multi-center randomized controlled clinical trials to confirm its surgical safety, oncological safety, and postoperative cosmetic outcomes is an important direction for future research.

Evolution of breast conserving surgery—current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review

A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery

Oncoplastic breast surgery: where are we now

Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed

Surgical techniques in breast cancer: an overview

Breast Cancer Surgery: New Issues

Oncoplastic resections for breast cancer: the effect of tumor localization and morphological features on the choice of surgical method: history of the issue (Literature review)

Modified oncoplastic lift, lymphatic excision, and reconstruction: Introduction of a novel technique in oncoplastic breast surgery with simple surgical principles

Current trends in breast cancer surgery

Oncoplasty in Breast Conservative Surgery

Improving quality of breast conservative surgery for lower quadrants cancer in small and medium sized breasts: Crescent technique versus J mammoplasty

Extreme oncoplasty: past, present and future

The Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Immediate Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction With Contralateral Breast Adjustment

The impact of advanced oncoplastic surgery on breast-conserving surgery rates: A retrospective cohort study of 3,875 breast cancer procedures at a tertiary referral centre

Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review

Efficacy and safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: An updated meta-analysis

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery versus standard breast conserving surgery for early and locally advanced breast cancer: a retrospective analysis from Sri Lanka

Parallel pathways: A chronicle of evolution in rectal and breast cancer surgery

Comparative analysis of the degree of patient satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical analysis of oncoplastic surgical techniques applied in breast-conserving surgery of early stage breast cancer

[Past and present of endoscopic surgery and robotic surgery in treatment of breast diseases]