Abstract:Satellite interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) has been playing an important role in the earthquake surface deformation observation and source model inversions with its advantage of fine spatial resolution in comparison with seismological data. At present, the two-step inversion approach, including a nonlinear inversion step for determining the fault geometry (e.g., length, width, depth, strike, dip, rake, slip) and a linear inversion step for estimating the slip distribution, is widely used to obtain seismic source parameters from satellite InSAR data. However, the nonlinear inversion step has some weaknesses, such as a prior knowledge requirement, local minima solution, complex and time-consuming. Coseismic differential interferogram is input into back propagation neural network (BPNN) to perform real time inversion of fault geometry in the previous study. But due to the simpleness of network structure, rake and slip parameters is fixed and inversion accuracy is limited. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach of Earthquake Source Parameters Inversion using ResNet (abbreviated as ESPI-ResNet) from satellite InSAR data. ESPI-ResNet is able to firstly classify the 4 fault types and then invert the 7 fault geometry parameters based on uniform slip model. We train our model by firstly creating a large dataset of simulated interferograms with source parameters ranges confined by seismological and geological data. The accuracy of fault type classification is 99.6% and root mean squared error (RMSE) of inversed fault geometry parameters is low in the simulated test dataset. To find most suitable model for seismic source parameters inversion, we further compare the inversed accuracy of different networks, including BPNN, VGG-16, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50 and DenseNet. We find that moderate increase of network depth and the use of convolution, deep residual learning can improve the model's performance for source parameters inversion, and therefore ResNet-34 is chosen as the backbone network in this study. Finally, real differential interferograms of Yutian earthquake (2020 Mw 6.3), Jiuzhaigou earthquake (2017 Mw 6.5) and Menyuan earthquake (2016 Mw 5.9) are used to validate the proposed method. Real earthquakes validation shows all of them have correct fault type classification, and the inverted results are consistent with the current seismic source parameters data.

Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data

Towards fast machine-learning-assisted Bayesian posterior inference of microseismic event location and source mechanism

An Inversion-Based Microseismic Simulator for Fracture Diagnostics

Microseismic Source Imaging Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Hard Constraints

Microseismic moment-tensor inversion and sensitivity analysis in vertically transverse isotropic media

Deep-Learning Inversion of Seismic Data

Microseismic Velocity Inversion Based on Deep Learning and Data Augmentation

Modeling Ambient Noise Distributions for Surface Wave Imaging Based on Full Waveform Inversion

Accelerating Bayesian microseismic event location with deep learning

Microseismic Source Localization Method Based on Neural Network Algorithm and Dynamic Reduction of Solution Interval

Accurate Microseismic Event Location Inversion Using a Gradient-Based Method

Inversion of seismic source parameters from satellite InSAR data based on deep learning

Source mechanism determination for hydraulic fracturing induced seismicity using full-waveform matching

Passive Surface-Wave Waveform Inversion for Source-Velocity Joint Imaging

Neural machine translation of seismic waves for petrophysical inversion

Microseismic Velocity Model Inversion and Source Location: the Use of Neighborhood Algorithm and Master Station Method

Seismic Inversion Based on Acoustic Wave Equations Using Physics-Informed Neural Network

Micro-seismic Elastic Reflection Full Waveform Inversion with An Equivalent Source

Probabilistic Neural Network Tomography across Grane field (North Sea) from Surface Wave Dispersion Data

Deep Neural Networks for Detection and Location of Microseismic Events and Velocity Model Inversion from Microseismic Data Acquired by Distributed Acoustic Sensing Array