Abstract:Previous research has primarily focused on static factors influencing cooperative behavior in social dilemmas, with less attention given to dynamic factors within group social interactions, such as positive feedback received during interactions, i.e., praise. This study, through a between-subjects online experiment with a single-factor, two-level design (praise: public praise/no praise), investigates the impact of praise on cooperative behavior changes across two rounds of a three-player public goods problem. Results revealed the following: (1) A positive correlation between individuals' contributions across two rounds and a negative correlation with the number of correct answers in rule comprehension questions were evident; for men, a correlation between rule comprehension and first-round contributions was observed. (2) Multilevel model results showed that praise, role, and rule comprehension significantly positively affected contribution changes across two rounds; gender did not significantly affect contribution changes. Specifically, under public-praise conditions, contribution changes were greater. Publicly praised individuals showed positive or negative behavior changes, while those not praised in the same group showed positive changes. Men contributed significantly more in the first round than women, with no gender difference found in contribution changes. Rule comprehension positively predicted contribution changes, indicating that more correct answers led to greater positive changes in contributions. These results not only support the inferential social learning perspective, suggesting that through praise, individuals can infer external world perceptions and self-evaluations, affecting both the praised (positively or negatively) and positively influencing non-praised individuals in the same group, but also provide a theoretical basis and intervention strategies for team and organizational management in groups.

Children Sustain Cooperation in a Threshold Public-Goods Game Even When Seeing Others' Outcomes

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Cooperation, but Not Competition, Improves 4-Year-old Children's Reasoning about Others' Diverse Desires.

The influence of cooperation and competition on preschoolers' prosociality toward in-group and out-group members

Common Knowledge Promotes Cooperation in the Threshold Public Goods Game by Reducing Uncertainty

Social rank and social cooperation: Impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making

The Impact of Praise on Cooperative Behavior in Three-Player Public Goods Games and Its Gender Differences

Cooperation Turns Preschoolers into Flexible Perspective Takers

Averting Depletion in a Two-Player Common Pool Resource Game: Being Seen, the Expectation of Future Encounters, and Biophilia Play a Role in Cooperation

Cooperation and Coordination in Threshold Public Goods Games with Asymmetric Players

Human cooperation in changing groups in a large-scale public goods game

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

The development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Long-term evidence on cooperation and cultural differences in public goods dilemmas

Excessive abundance of common resources deters social responsibility

Emergence of Social Cooperation in Threshold Public Goods Games with Collective Risk.

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.