Abstract:Background Remifentanil may have a dose‐dependent haemodynamic effect during the induction of general anaesthesia combined with propofol. Our objective was to investigate whether systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) was reduced to a greater extent when the remifentanil dose was increased. Methods This randomised, double‐blind, dose‐controlled study was conducted at the Day Surgery Unit of Haugesund Hospital, Norway. Ninety‐nine healthy women scheduled for gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive remifentanil induction with a low, medium or high dose corresponding to maximum effect‐site concentrations (Ce) of 2, 4 and 8 ng/mL. The induction dose of propofol was 1.8 mg/kg, with a Ce of 2.9 μg/mL. Anaesthesia was induced using target‐controlled infusion. After 150 s of sedation, a bolus of remifentanil and propofol was administered. Baseline was defined as 55–5 s before the bolus dose, and the total observation time was 450 s. We used beat‐to‐beat haemodynamic monitoring with LiDCOplus. The primary outcome variable was the maximum decrease in SAP within 5 min after bolus administration of remifentanil and propofol. Absolute and relative changes from baseline to minimal values and the area under the curve (AUC) were used as effect measures. Comparisons of groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Median remifentanil doses were 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 μg/kg in the low‐, medium‐ and high‐dose groups, respectively. The absolute changes (mean ± standard deviation) in SAP in the low‐, medium‐ and high‐dose groups of remifentanil were −39 ± 9.6 versus −43 ± 9.1, and −41 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. No difference (95% confidence interval) in the absolute change in SAP was observed between the groups (ANOVA, p = .29); medium versus low dose 3.7 (−2.0, 9.4) mmHg, and high versus medium dose −2.2 (−8.0; 3.5) mmHg. The relative changes from baseline to minimum SAP values were −30% versus −32% versus −32% (p = .52). The between‐group differences in the AUC were not statistically significant. Relative changes in heart rate (−20% vs. −21% vs. −21%), stroke volume (−19% vs. −16% vs. −16%), cardiac output (−32% vs. −32% vs. −32%), systemic vascular resistance (−24% vs. −27% vs. −28%), and AUC were not statistically significant. Conclusion This trial demonstrated major haemodynamic changes during the induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. However, we did not observe any statistically significant differences between low, medium or high doses of remifentanil when using continuous invasive high‐accuracy beat‐to‐beat monitoring.

Effect of remifentanil on three effect-site concentrations of propofol and their relationship during electroencephalography at loss of response, at maximum alpha power, and at onset of burst suppression: a prospective randomized trial

Dose-response Relationship of Remifentanil Inhibiting Responses to Endotracheal Intubation when Combined with Propofol in Severely Preeclamptic Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section

Effect of Remimazolam Supplementation on Propofol Requirements During Hysteroscopy: A Double-Blind, Dose-Response Study.

Propofol EC50 for Inducing Loss of Consciousness in Patients under Combined Epidural-General Anesthesia or General Anesthesia Alone: a Randomized Double-Blind Study

Effect of target-control infusion of remifentanil on concentration for 50% of maximal effect of propofol required for loss of consciousness and onset of EEG burst suppression

A Comparison of Different Remifentanil Effect-Site Concentrations to Allow for Early Extubation After Cardiac Surgery

Influence of Remifentanil on Cp50 of Propofol Given by Target-Controlled Fusion for Loss of Consciousness

Effect of Remifentanil on Propofol Pharmacokinetics with Target Controlled Infusion in Elderly Patients

Association of different combination doses of remifentanil-propofol with transcranial motor-evoked potentials during skull base surgery

Effect of remifentanil on loss of consciousness in the elderly during induction of anaesthesia with propofol

Influence of Opioids on Propofol Pharmacodynamics During Anesthesia Induction in Pediatric Patients

The Effect of Target- Controlled Infusion of Remifentanil As Sole Agent on BIS and AEPI

[Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Propofol and Remifentanil on the Tolerance Response to Electrical Tetanus Stimuli].

The Influence of Remifentanil on the Dynamic Relationship between Sevoflurane and Surrogate Anesthetic Effect Measures Derived from the EEG

Haemodynamic effects of remifentanil during induction of general anaesthesia with propofol. A randomised trial

Depth of Anesthesia During Multidrug Infusion: Separating the Effects of Propofol and Remifentanil Using the Spectral Features of EEG

Effect of Different Target Plasma Concentrations of Remifentanil on Sedative Effect of Propofol

Comparison of Esketamine and Remifentanil in Combination with Propofol in Patients with Septic Shock Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A cortical source localization analysis of resting EEG data after remifentanil infusion

Effect of remifentanil co-administered with propofol on stress response and postoperative complications in patients with cerebral hemorrhage undergoing surgical anesthesia

Pharmacodynamics interaction between propofol and remifentanil under different harmful stimulations analyzed by response surface methodology