Abstract:Background Remifentanil may have a dose‐dependent haemodynamic effect during the induction of general anaesthesia combined with propofol. Our objective was to investigate whether systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) was reduced to a greater extent when the remifentanil dose was increased. Methods This randomised, double‐blind, dose‐controlled study was conducted at the Day Surgery Unit of Haugesund Hospital, Norway. Ninety‐nine healthy women scheduled for gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive remifentanil induction with a low, medium or high dose corresponding to maximum effect‐site concentrations (Ce) of 2, 4 and 8 ng/mL. The induction dose of propofol was 1.8 mg/kg, with a Ce of 2.9 μg/mL. Anaesthesia was induced using target‐controlled infusion. After 150 s of sedation, a bolus of remifentanil and propofol was administered. Baseline was defined as 55–5 s before the bolus dose, and the total observation time was 450 s. We used beat‐to‐beat haemodynamic monitoring with LiDCOplus. The primary outcome variable was the maximum decrease in SAP within 5 min after bolus administration of remifentanil and propofol. Absolute and relative changes from baseline to minimal values and the area under the curve (AUC) were used as effect measures. Comparisons of groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Median remifentanil doses were 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 μg/kg in the low‐, medium‐ and high‐dose groups, respectively. The absolute changes (mean ± standard deviation) in SAP in the low‐, medium‐ and high‐dose groups of remifentanil were −39 ± 9.6 versus −43 ± 9.1, and −41 ± 10 mmHg, respectively. No difference (95% confidence interval) in the absolute change in SAP was observed between the groups (ANOVA, p = .29); medium versus low dose 3.7 (−2.0, 9.4) mmHg, and high versus medium dose −2.2 (−8.0; 3.5) mmHg. The relative changes from baseline to minimum SAP values were −30% versus −32% versus −32% (p = .52). The between‐group differences in the AUC were not statistically significant. Relative changes in heart rate (−20% vs. −21% vs. −21%), stroke volume (−19% vs. −16% vs. −16%), cardiac output (−32% vs. −32% vs. −32%), systemic vascular resistance (−24% vs. −27% vs. −28%), and AUC were not statistically significant. Conclusion This trial demonstrated major haemodynamic changes during the induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. However, we did not observe any statistically significant differences between low, medium or high doses of remifentanil when using continuous invasive high‐accuracy beat‐to‐beat monitoring.

Feasibility study for the administration of remifentanil based on the difference between response entropy and state entropy

Comparison of Surgical Stress Index-Guided Analgesia with Standard Clinical Practice During Routine General Anesthesia A Pilot Study

Determination of Entropy Level in Open Heart Surgery Comparing Remifentanil and Propofol

A Comparison of Different Remifentanil Effect-Site Concentrations to Allow for Early Extubation After Cardiac Surgery

Photoplethysmography Response To Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion During Propofol-Remifentanil Anethesia

The Influence of Remifentanil on the Dynamic Relationship between Sevoflurane and Surrogate Anesthetic Effect Measures Derived from the EEG

Association of different combination doses of remifentanil-propofol with transcranial motor-evoked potentials during skull base surgery

[Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Propofol and Remifentanil on the Tolerance Response to Electrical Tetanus Stimuli].

Photoplethysmography-derived Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy As Measures of Analgesia Depth During Propofol–remifentanil Anesthesia

The Median Effective Concentration of Remifentanil to Inhibit Pupillary Reflex Dilation Induced by Endotracheal Intubation.

Pharmacodynamic interaction between sevoflurane and remifentanil regarding tolerance of responses to electrical tetanus stimuli

The Effectiveness of Low-dose Esmketamine Versus Remifentanil Adjunct to Propofol for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Trigeminal Neuralgia

Response Surface Analysis of Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Interactions on Consciousness During Anesthesia

Comparison of Esketamine and Remifentanil in Combination with Propofol in Patients with Septic Shock Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacodynamic Interactions between Remifentanil and Sevoflurane during General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Operations

Analysis of depth of anesthesia with Hilbert-Huang spectral entropy.

Remifentanil pharmacodynamics during conscious sedation using algometry: a more clinically relevant pharmacodynamical model

Comparative analysis of the effect of electromyogram to bispectral index and 95% spectral edge frequency under remimazolam and propofol anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Haemodynamic effects of remifentanil during induction of general anaesthesia with propofol. A randomised trial

Comparing remifentanil and sufentanil in stress reduction during neurosurgery: a randomised controlled trial

Effect of remifentanil on three effect-site concentrations of propofol and their relationship during electroencephalography at loss of response, at maximum alpha power, and at onset of burst suppression: a prospective randomized trial