Comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes in different time intervals following GnRH antagonist stimulation and modified natural frozen-thawed embryo transfers

Li Dong,Yan Su,Mian-Qiu Zhang,Jing-Wen Sun,Hui Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2424347
2024-11-09
Human Fertility
Abstract:To evaluate whether the interval between oocyte retrieval and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) affects clinical outcomes using modified natural cycle (mNC) regimen following freeze-all GnRH antagonist stimulation. A total of 542 patients underwent first mNC-FET were divided into two groups: immediate (FET conducted in the first menstrual cycle after freeze-all) and delayed (FET performed in the second or subsequent menstrual cycle) groups. The immediate group was associated with a notably reduced duration between oocyte retrieval and transfer day (35.5 ± 5.8 vs. 88.7 ± 35.5 d, P < 0.001). Regarding pregnancy results, the immediate cycles resulted in comparable implantation rate (55.3% vs . 57.2%, P = 0.624), clinical pregnancy rate (66.9% vs . 72.2%, P = 0.236), abortion rate (16.1% vs . 12.7%, P = 0.402), ongoing pregnancy rate (59.0% vs . 65.0%, P = 0.204), and live birth rate (56.1% vs . 63.0%, P = 0.149) with the delayed cycles. After the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the difference in live birth outcome between the two regimens remained insignificant (immediate vs . delayed protocol: adjusted odds ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval= 0.56–1.33). Immediate mNC-FET following a freeze-all antagonist cycle displayed promising clinical outcomes and significantly shortened the time to conception compared to delayed FET.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?