Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study was to describe and validate a simple method to quantitatively calculate the missing area of the anterior part of the glenoid in anterior glenohumeral instability. Materials and methods: The calculations were developed from three-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed computerized tomography en face images of the glenoid with "subtraction" of the humeral head in 13 consecutive cases with known anterior glenohumeral joint instability diagnosed by history and clinical examination. The inferior portion of the glenoid was approximated to a true circle whose center was determined by means of a femoral head gauge. The eroded anterior area was calculated as the ratio between the depth (a perpendicular line from the center of the circle to the eroded edge of the anterior glenoid) and the radius of the inferior glenoid circle. This data was then compared to the results obtained by two additional different methods: direct computerized measurements of the missing area and direct computerized measurement of the ratio between the radius and depth, on two dimensional computed tomography (CT) en face view reconstructions of the glenoid. Results: We provide a function that correlates the ratio between depth and radius of the inferior glenoid circle and the area of the missing anterior glenoid. The results obtained by three different methods were comparable. Simple trigonometric calculations showed that a 5% area defect corresponds to 0.8 (12.5%) of the radius of the inferior glenoid, while a 20% area defect corresponds to 0.5 (50%) of the same radius (Table 1). Table 1 Results according to each different method Patient Sex Side CA1 MA1 PAM1 R2 D2 PAM2 R3 D3 PAM3 1 M R 738 19.1 2.58 15.1 13.4 2.45 16 14 2.6 2 M R 462.6 30.5 6.59 11.9 9.7 4.83 16 10 12.97 3 F L 359 24.5 6.82 17 11.8 9.86 11.8 17 9.86 4 M L 522 59.4 11.37 12.7 9.1 8.95 16 10 12.97 5 M L 670 93.1 13.89 13.6 7.6 16.84 16 9 16.31 6 M R 659 137.5 20.8 14.3 7.1 20.10 20 8 25.23 7 M L 520 137 26.34 11.6 5.1 23.49 16 8 19.55 AVG 12.63 12.36 14.21 SD 8.46 7.92 7.20 CA1 Area of circle directly measured by MPR software, MA1 missing area of circle measured by MPR software, PAM1 calculated (100 x MA1/CA1) percentage area missing for method 1, R2 radius of the circle measured by MPR software, D2 depth from the missing edge to the center of the circle measured by MPR software, PAM2 calculated Percentage area missing from R2 and D2 using the function "q" (Appendix), R3 radius of the circle measured with a femoral gauge, D3 depth from the missing edge to the center of the circle measured with a femoral gauge, PAM3 calculated Percentage area missing from R3 and D3 using the function "q" (Appendix), AVG average, SD standard deviation Conclusion: Using this simple method and the function provided, the eroded area of the anterior part of the glenoid in anterior glenohumeral instability can be calculated preoperatively using a 3D CT reconstruction of the glenoid with "subtraction" of the humeral head, obviating the need for sophisticated software to obtain this critical information for preoperative decision making.

Objective calculation of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability based on the contour of the posteroinferior quadrant using the best-fit circle method: an accurate and reproducible evaluation

A simple method for quantitative evaluation of the missing area of the anterior glenoid in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint

Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Determination of the Center of the Glenoid Inferior Portion

Disagreement Between the Accepted Best-Fit Circle Method to Calculate Bone Loss Between Injured and Uninjured Shoulders

Management of glenoid bone loss with impaction and structural bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Reliability of Manual Measurements Versus Semiautomated Software for Glenoid Bone Loss Quantification in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability

A formula for instability-related bone loss: estimating glenoid width and redefining bare spot

Radiological Study on Bone Defect of the Glenoid Cavity in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Glenoid Segmentation from Computed Tomography Scans Based on a 2-Stage Deep Learning Model for Glenoid Bone Loss Evaluation

Assessing the current role of AP and Bernageau view radiographs in measurement of glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation: correlation with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy

Comparison of the Glenoid Index by Computed Tomography With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Accuracy and reliability of imaging modalities for studying bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review

Multi-slice CT Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss in Patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

What Is the Critical Value of Glenoid Bone Loss at Which Soft Tissue Bankart Repair Does Not Restore Glenohumeral Translation, Restricts Range of Motion, and Leads to Abnormal Humeral Head Position?

Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

IODA-shoulder®, a 3-dimensional automated software for glenoid bone loss quantification in shoulder instability. A validation study

Effective glenoid track: A novel concept for shoulder instability

Management of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability

Risk Factors for Anterior Shoulder Instability: a Matched Case-Control Study

Glenoid Track Width Is Smaller Under Dynamic Conditions: An In Vivo Dual-Fluoroscopy Imaging Study

Bipolar Bone Loss in Male Athletes With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Evaluation Using a New Scoring System